Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Quartz-Magnetite oxygen isotope thermometers
From:
"Ilya N. Bindeman" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Apr 2000 08:55:00 -0500
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hello everybody,

Is anyone aware of recent (after 1993) or current experiments on
quartz-magnetite oxygen isotope fractionation?
Will  the use of laser have a large advantage, given that magnetite is a
difficult phase to react conventionally?

When I apply Quartz-Magnetite oxygen isotope thermometers to different
zoned tuffs (in order to determine the quenching temperature) and then
compare it to the temperature determined using Magnetite-Ilmenite, I mostly
discover that former (Quartz-Magnetite) temperature is often >100 C higher.
There should be something systematically different in one of these methods.
Analytical?

Ilya Bindeman
Research Associate
Department of Geology and Geophysics
University of Wisconsin
1215 W Dayton Str
Madison WI 53706
USA

608-262-7118
[log in to unmask]
http://geology.wisc.edu/~inbindem

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV