Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:15:47 +0100
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: CO2 standard problem
From:
Wolfram Meier-Augenstein <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
Dundee University
Comments:
cc: Ian D Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Dear Ian,

Having had my Delta PlusXL delivered just recently, I can't provide
any valuable input (see below) but I would be dearly interested in
your progress with this problem.

> We are currently experiencing problems with our Finnigan Delta PlusXL.
> Since Monday the 45/44 ratio for the CO2 reference gas has changed from
> 1.157812 to 1.169340 and consequently all measured values are incorrect.
> The 45/44 ratio of an injected C19 n-alkane standard has remained
> constant over the same period of time. We have checked the reference gas
> inlet assembly and everything is working as it should.
>
> The 45/44 value measued on our DeltaS, for the same cylinder of gas has
> remained constant at 1.1500.

I would seem you have covered all the bases. I take it you are
absolutely sure there is no mass discrimination happening along
the flow path of the reference inlet on the XLPlus? No idle hands
having tinkered with the capillaries, unions or the pressure
regulators (incl. bleed lines)?

Raw data isotope ratios are by no means constant, hence the need
for a reference but one would have thought that any shift should
affect all measured ratios more or less the same (at least that's the
premise we're working with). Since your C19 remains constant
(within reason) and only your CO2 gas changed the finger of
suspicion would point to the CO2 line (from cylinder to reference
inlet assembly). Yet, you checked it and it seems fine.

One SWAG in could offer (SWAG = scientific wild ass guess) is a
change in software settings for the reference peak. The other one
would be a break-in of moisture into your CO2 line resulting in
protonation of the CO2 (44) leading to HCO2 (45).

Why not ask Willie Brand what he makes of it? I think there's
hardly anything in IRMS he hasn't seen yet.


Best regards,
                       Wolfram





Dr. W. Meier-Augenstein, CChem MRSC
Senior Research Fellow

University of Dundee, Dept. of Anatomy & Physiology,
OMS, Small's Wynd, DUNDEE  DD1 4HN, United Kingdom

Tel.: +44-(0)1382-34/5124, /4574, /4968
Fax:  +44-(0)1382-34/5514

e-mail: [log in to unmask] (work)
e-mail: [log in to unmask] (home)

URL: http://www.dundee.ac.uk/anatphys/wma/meieraug.htm


NB Message is confidential and for recipient only: Unauthorized reading and copying
may result in legal action! Opinions expressed are those of the author and not the institution.
LEGAL NOTICE: Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and
may be privileged.  It is intended for the addressee(s) only.  Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not an addressee, any
disclosure or copying of the contents of this e-mail or any action taken (or not
taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV