Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:33:47 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear listmembers,
I would like some comment on the following:
During our 13C in soil analyses we have noticed that the standard deviations
of some samples were better than others. In the beginning I thought this was
probably caused by contamination during weighing, so we analysed them again.
And again the same samples had a better standard deviation than others. All
samples have +/- the same carbon-content and were measured in the same
batch.
Of course I know that there is such a thing as a matrix-effect, but can it
really influence the results that much, even if the weighed amount and the
'type' is the same (type = all soils, just different fractions and different
locations)? I am talking about variations in standard deviation (n=3) of
about 0.1 (sdevs around 0.15 permil for 'worst' samples and about 0.05
permil for 'best' samples).
Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Peter
---
Peter Vervloedt
Laboratory of Applied Physical Chemistry
Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological sciences
Ghent University
Coupure, 653
9000 Gent
Belgium
tel.: +32 (0)9 264 6048
fax.: +32 (0)9 264 6230
http://fltbwww.rug.ac.be/isofys
"I have not failed. I've just found 10000 ways that won't work"
- Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
---
|
|
|