Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
efficacy of various aragonite versus calcite discriminators
From:
"Stephen A. Schellenberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:06:41 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<p05010406b7f0d1300703@[132.198.144.99]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Hello all.  Would anyone care to comment on their experiences with
non-XRD- and non-optical-based methods for discriminating between
aragonite and calcite, particularly their relative proportions in
small powdered samples?  Thanks, Stephen
--
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

Stephen A. Schellenberg
Institute of Marine Sciences
University of California
1156 High Street - EMS-A232
Santa Cruz, CA 95064

831.459.3123 - Lab
831.459.3074 - Fax

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV