Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
34S of marine organisms
From:
Todd Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:40:02 -0500
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Greetings,

I have several questions regarding use of sulfur stable isotopes,
particularly in the marine environment.  Understandably, 34S has been used
on microbial systems (marshes, estuarine and hydrothermal vent
communities), with the general trend being marine sulfur to be more
enriched than freshwater/estuarine.  My question is, why has sulfur not
been applied to marine zooplankton and fish?  To my knowledge, very little
work has been done on this.  My guess is that once in the marine
environment, sulfur values vary and are not linked to any particular
(known) mechanism/process.  Another question is, how much material do I
need for sulfur analysis of marine zooplankton and fish.

If anyone out there has ideas or thoughts on this (or references!), it
would be greatly appreciated!

Sincerely,
Todd

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV