 
| Received: |
from pene.science.adelaide.edu.au (pene.science.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.84.2]) by list.uvm.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id TAA13402 for < [log in to unmask]>; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 19:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
from mac013.geology.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.168.13] by pene.science.adelaide.edu.au (8.7.3/AndrewR-941108) with SMTP id JAA01662 for < [log in to unmask]>; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 09:13:19 +0930 (CST) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
| TO: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 09:15:10 +0930 |
| Subject: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| From: |
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| X-Sender: |
|
| Message-Id: |
<v01540b00ae6e21ef43f1@[129.127.168.13]> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HI everyone, especially Mattey,
What is the best, most simplest and cost effective manner in analysing
carbon isotopes from basalt? Should it be done as Mattey et al. do it
(using increasing heating steps, etc.)? I mean, I would like to keep to a
standard, but I must admit if there is a quicker way, which can provide
similar results then that's for me. All I want to do is get a carbon
isotope signature from basalt (preferably the original carbon)!!!
|
|
|
