Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: N2 without a reduction furnace
From:
Wolfram Meier-Augenstein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 31 Jul 1997 08:16:52 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
DearDear Neil,

I think you can safely ignore any formation of N2O in the oxidation
furnace since N2O is not stable at temperatures usually encountered
in our systems, i.e. > 800 C. In fact, at temperatures above 600 C
N2O "decays" according to 2 N2O ---> 2 N2 + O2 (which is an
exothermal reaction; +19.61 kcal/mol).

Any nitrogen oxides formed during the combustion process originate
from N containing organics such as amines and nitriles.

The production of nitrogen oxides from the elements is an endothermic
process. N2 is just too lethargic to react. For this reason,
technically N2O or NO are made from NH3 and HNO3 or NH3 and O2,
respectively.

Even if there would some formation of N2O it would be so minimal that
the cold trap could easily deal with it (bp of N2O -88.48 C, mp
-99.86C).

But this is by the by, go for the method you feel most confident and,
hence, comfortable with.


Good luck.

                               Wolfram ;-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV