Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
sulphur contamination
From:
James Andrew Hall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:56:51 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (13 lines)
Dear Group,
                I have been investigating stable carbon isotope ratios of
organic contaminants in the sub-surface of a disused manufactured gas
plant. This involves injecting solvent extracts and getting the
mass spectra and d13C ratio.  Whenever molecular sulphur is identified on
the quadropole, the 46/44 ratio for the background subtraction on the IRMS
(Isoprime, Micromass) goes off the scale, making automated or manual
correction practically impossible. Has anyone any ideas what is causing
the 46 ion? I can't figure it out. I hope the answer is not too obvious!
                                Thank you

                                James Hall.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV