Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: quartz fiber filters
From:
Klaus Dittert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:53:51 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Dear Klaus,
can you recommend any quartz filters that worked well for your applications?
Did you modify precleaning of those filters as compared to GF/F?
Thanks for your hints
Klaus



----------------------------------------------------------------
  Klaus Dittert, PhD.
  Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
  Kiel University
  Olshausenstrasse 40-60
  D-24118 Kiel, Germany
  phone + 49 431 880 3196
  fax + 49 431 880 1625
  email: [log in to unmask]


----- Original Message -----
From: Klaus-Uwe Richter <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: quartz fiber filters


> Dear Paul,
>
> we compared glasfiber filters with quartz fiber filers for field sampling
> of marine plankton and found no significant differences in the isotopic
> composition for 13C and 15N. We used quartz fiber instead of glas fiber
out
> of the same practical reasons you mentioned. The only disadvantages of
> using quartz fiber are:
> 1: the reduced capacity of our ANCA system because the volume of quartz
> fiber stay nearly the same before and after oxidation, filling up the
> oxidation tube quickly
> 2: difficulties to to press the quartz filters in tin vials to get them
> into a spherical shape for the autosampler (we normaly use a special hand
> press for filter samples)
> 3: differences in poresizes between commericial available quartz and glas
> filters (classical definition of dissolved versus particulate matter in
> marine POM studies)
> 4: we had higher blank values for quartz fiber filters during the acid
> fuming step, most probable reason is the higher amount of fiber in the
> thick quartz fiber filters we used in comparison to the normal thin
GF/F´s.
>
> Altogether we are quit happy with the quartz fiber filters since
> (1) evenso we have to clean the oxidation tube more often this job is much
> more easy with quartz fiber/ash than with molten glas and the tube it is
no
> longer damaged by molten glas sticking to the inner walls and metal oxide
> packing of the tube
> (2) with some tryouts it was possible to find a suitable folding technique
> for the tin foil
> (3) depending on the application different poresize can often be used
> without a problem
> (4) blanks were only a problem at very smal sample sizes
>
> I hope this helps,
>
> Klaus-Uwe Richter
>
> Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeresforschung
> Am Handelshafen 12
> 27570 Bremerhaven, GERMANY
> Tel: 0471 48311482
> Fax: 0471 48311425
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV