Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: C isotope fractionation
From:
Andrew Tait <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:54:47 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hi everyone,

Graeme Burton wrote the following about Re: C isotope fractionation:

> RE: Verma/Durakiewicz Discussion
>
> >I suggest we do not occupy the Isogeochem server any more for this subject.
>
> Please do occupy it!  It's only just getting interesting!!

I think this is a good idea too.  And not just because I want to see
an Internet cat-fight ;)  The opposite, actually.  It's always
enlightening to see people question science, rather than accept a
published article or paper as gospel.  The two possible outcomes, the
questioner being wrong, or the paper being wrong can only help to
enhance our knowledge of the subject, through re-investigation.

So, go fight boys.  Err...  I mean, let's have a nice debate.

Andrew

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV