Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: efficacy of various aragonite versus calcite discriminators
From:
Julia Lee-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:01:01 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
FTIR is a quick and easy way of differentiating calcite and
aragonite. It only requires 1.5mg of material using KBr disks.
However, although I don't know the precision offhand  I don't
believe it's as good as that mentioned by Kathryn for ESR.

Julia Lee-Thorp

> Hello all.  Would anyone care to comment on their experiences with
> non-XRD- and non-optical-based methods for discriminating between
> aragonite and calcite, particularly their relative proportions in
> small powdered samples?  Thanks, Stephen
> --
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>
> Stephen A. Schellenberg
> Institute of Marine Sciences
> University of California
> 1156 High Street - EMS-A232
> Santa Cruz, CA 95064
>
> 831.459.3123 - Lab
> 831.459.3074 - Fax
>
>
Julia Lee-Thorp
Associate Professor
Faculty of Science
University of Cape Town
P/B Rondebosch 7701
South Africa
Tel. 027-21 6502350
Fax. 027-21 6502352

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV