Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 13C18O2
From:
Nick Ostle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:34:41 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
ISOGEOCHEMISTS,

The research that I am involved in requires the use of both  C and O
enriched isotopes in the same tracer studies and I need to be sure
that I can correctly attribute values to 13C/12C and 18O/16O in CO2.
Manufacturers suggest that their instruments can do this by using the
mz 46/44 ratio. However when both C and O of CO2 are enriched this is
not always possible as the Craig 18O correction is designed for
near-natural abundance levels. Any ideas?

nick




                     Nick Ostle
      Institute of Terrestrial Ecology
                ITE- Merlewood
             Grange-Over-Sands
              Cumbria, LA11 6JU
                     England

           e-mail: [log in to unmask]
        tel: ++44 (0)15395 32264
        fax: ++44(0)015395 34705

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV