Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
D/H procedure
Attila Demeny <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 17 Aug 1998 10:27:38 -0000
text/plain (34 lines)
Dear Tonu,

As we discussed, I send you my procedure described below.
The procedure I use for water samples:
- put 100 mg Zn into 6 mm pyrex (or simax, this is a Czech
equivalent) tubes
- pump the tubes and heat the zinc until it starts evaporating, then
pump until
good vacuum is reached again,
- let dry air into the tubes, detach from the vacuum line, drop a
piece of
capillary containing the water sample immediately, and attach to the
line
- freeze with LN2 for 2-3 min, then pump
- flame-seal the tubes.

I hope this helps. Additional information about the zinc amount
effect is in Demeny (1995,  H isotope fractionation ..., Chem.
Geol., 121,
19-25.). In short, when impure waters are analysed, a solution is to
put more zinc into the reaction tubes. However, I found that
changing the zinc amount with the same water quantity changes the
dD value obtained.

Best regards,
Attila

Dr. Attila Demeny
Laboratory for Geochemical Research
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Budapest, Budaorsi ut 45, H-1112, Hungary
tel/fax: 36-1-319-3145
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV