ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Tyler B Coplen II, Research Chemist, Reston, VA "<[log in to unmask]> (Tyler Coplen)
Date:
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 09:19:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
DIC 13C extraction methodolgies were studies by

Hassan, A. A., Methodologies for extraction of dissolved inorganic carbon
for stable carbon isotope studies:  Evaluation and Alternatives,  U.S.
Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 82-6, 51 p., 1982.

>Dear Isogeochemers,
>I was wondering if I could obtain a survey of the relative merits of sampling
>ground water for the del-13C of inorganic carbon with either of these two
>
>methods:
>1.  Collecting water poisoned by HgCl2 and then acidified by phosphoric acid in
>the lab.
>2.  Collecting water with BaCl2 or SrCl2 allowing BaCO3 or SrCO3 to form.
>Filtering the precipitate and then acidifying with phosphoric acid in the lab.
>
>Are there any publications that compare the accuracies of each approach?  
>Any advice would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks, T.C. Onstott
>






ATOM RSS1 RSS2