Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 13C on DIC
From:
[log in to unmask] (T.C. Onstott)
Date:
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:34:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Thanks Ty and Ethan for the reference.  This should get me on the way.

>DIC 13C extraction methodolgies were studies by
>
>Hassan, A. A., Methodologies for extraction of dissolved inorganic carbon
>for stable carbon isotope studies:  Evaluation and Alternatives,  U.S.
>Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 82-6, 51 p., 1982.
>
>>Dear Isogeochemers,
>>I was wondering if I could obtain a survey of the relative merits of sampling
>>ground water for the del-13C of inorganic carbon with either of these two
>>
>>methods:
>>1.  Collecting water poisoned by HgCl2 and then acidified by phosphoric acid
>>in
>>the lab.
>>2.  Collecting water with BaCl2 or SrCl2 allowing BaCO3 or SrCO3 to form.
>>Filtering the precipitate and then acidifying with phosphoric acid in the lab.
>>
>>Are there any publications that compare the accuracies of each approach?
>>Any advice would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks, T.C. Onstott
>>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV