Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: netiquette
From:
Andrew Tait <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Jan 1998 23:36:09 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Peter Naor wrote the following about Re: Re : netiquette:

> What I have learned from individuals in England and Germany is that they
> pay !!!"$"!!! for on-line time and any any long attachments, with no
> interest to them, cost them a bundle....

Hey, I really don't want to clutter the list with an argument on
netiquette.  There are plenty of Usenet groups for that stuff.  For
future reference:  (1) Not all people on the list use PCs and Macs for
accessing their email, and so don't have access to Microsoft
"standard" (heh!) packages.  (2) Not everyone is accessing isogeochem
from a "free" connection, whether through work, or at home.  (3) In
general, posting binaries to a newsgroup (unless a "binary"
newsgroup) or mailing list is bad practice, in that you create a large
amount of unnecessary traffic.

Let's stop this thread, before it reaches the volume of the original
posting!!

Totty  <8^)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV