Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
reference materials for 13C/18O -Reply
From:
Tim Heaton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 06 Feb 1996 10:05:39 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Frank

I agree with your points about references gases in a general way.
However I think you will find that having a reference gas with isotope
ratios close to those of your typical sample gas does have advantages
for high precision, and perhaps especially for long-term comparisons. It
may depend on the instrument.

Some indication can come from a simple test running reference gas
against itself (sometimes called Zero Enrichment run), at different
pressures of, say, 2E-9 to 2E-8 amps <44> (with reference and sample
sides well balanced). Then repeat using a sample gas which has C and
O ratios quite different from those of the reference (e.g. CO2 produced
from carbonate vs normal cylinder CO2). Are the raw sample vs ref
ratios independent of pressure in the second test?

Best wishes

Tim


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV