Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CO for TC/EA in USA
From:
Simon Poulson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:36:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Dear Dennis and others,

I'm currently in the process of trying to arrange for direct shipment of a
CO tank from BOC in the UK to the US.  As far as I can tell, CO from the UK
typically has a "normal" isotopic abundance, like gas from Germany.  I've
gotten a quote of 88 pounds sterling for 1.7 cubic metres of CO, purity
99.9%.  We have to purchase the gas cylinder outright (another 150 pounds
sterling), but BOC tells me that they will re-fill the tank in the future,
as needed.  Right now I'm waiting for a quote for shipping by surface
freight, as the price for shipping by air freight is expensive (245 pounds
sterling, and even then that's only to San Francisco, not Reno).

As an aside, I was wondering if anybody had any thoughts as to whether very
high purity CO is necessary, i.e. a purity better than 99.9%.  I've used a
small tank of CO with purity 99.5% and a very light isotopic composition,
and was finding that I could get what I thought was acceptable
reproducibility, with a standard deviation of d18O of 0.2 per mil (or
slightly better), which makes me think that very high purity CO is
unnecessary.

Cheers,
Simon

*****
Simon R. Poulson
Dept. of Geological Sciences, MS-172
University of Nevada-Reno
Reno, NV 89557-0138
USA
Phone: (775) 784-1104
Fax: (775) 784-1833
[log in to unmask]
*****

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV