Hi all,
A few days ago I posted a question about the current technological status
and future potential of CRDS, and thanks to all who replied.
I've learned that firstly, when asking a broad question about a specific
technology I should refrain from mentioning a single manufacturer as this
might be construed as bias on my own part and possibly get marketing
departments in trouble. Secondly, everyone is very happy with current
applications and judging by the cost and quality of data it's easy to see
why.
Thirdly, and most important to my initial posting, is that reactions are at
best mixed as to whether it will replace IRMS or keep its current niche,
although work is advancing on adding peripheries so as to broaden the
application beyond gases.
In short, I'll have to wait and see if CRDS really will spell the end for
IRMS applications.
Again, thanks to everyone who contributed to the discussion!

-- 
Robert J. Panetta
Dept. Chemistry and Biochemistry
Concordia University
Montreal