| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Tue, 12 May 2009 11:53:36 -0700 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
H3 calibration has been performed, and is consistently around 6 (not
0.6 as I wrote below!)
Paul
At 11:17 AM 12/05/2009, you wrote:
>HI Paul--
>
>H3+ calibration???
>
>take care
>
>gerry
>
>Paul Eby wrote:
>>Listmembers,
>>
>>Has anyone ever seen a calibration slope (known and measured values
>>of two standards) deviate significantly from the expected 0.95 to
>>1.05? We are consistently seeing 0.67.
>>
>>This is a new Delta Advantage. d13C and d18O on a pair of OzTech
>>CO2 standards by dual inlet both have a slope of approximately 1,
>>so the instrument is otherwise working fine (similar results by GasBench).
>>
>>Hydrogen is a different story: a pair of OzTech standards by dual
>>inlet has a consistent slope of 0.67, and SMOW/GISP/SLAP by
>>H/Device shows similar results. H3 is consistently around 0.6, and
>>the calibration performed on the H/Device seems stable enough that
>>I could probably ignore the issue and run.
>>
>>Any suggestions out there on how this could be?
>>
>>Paul Eby
>>
>>
>>[log in to unmask]
>>Alberta Research Council
>>
>>Vancouver Island Technology Park
>>3 - 4476 Markham St.
>>Victoria, BC, Canada V8Z 7X8
>>
>>Phone: 250-483-3290
>>Fax: 250-483-1989
|
|
|