I think the replies posted by Andrea and Luis deserve a "public"
response and at the risk of alienating all list members I'd like to ask
two questions. These questions apply equally to each of the three common
methods of treatment (roasting, chloroxing, plasma ashing) and are
intended for all people who work with this problem (not just Andrea and
Luis). For brevity I'm going to phrase the questions for the roasting
method, but you can substitute any of the other methods.

 

Q1. If roasting at 200oC is the right method, how do you view data
produced from samples that have been chloroxed or plasma ashed? Are all
methods equally valid, or is yours the only true path to enlightenment?

 

Q2. How do you know that your roasted samples yield the true isotopic
composition? Are you saying that that you analysed untreated and roasted
sub-samples of the same material and obtained identical isotopic values?
Or are you saying that untreated and treated sub-samples yielded
different isotopic values and that your treated samples yielded isotopic
values more consistent with your expectations? If you answer yes to the
first question, then treatments are unnecessary. If the answer to the
second question is also yes, then how do you know that your expectations
are correct?

 

The implication of question 2 is: if you start with a sample of unknown
isotopic composition that contains organic matter, structurally-bound
water etc. you can either analyse it untreated, in which case its
measured composition might be compromised by the presence of the
contaminants, or you can treat it, in which case its measured
composition might be compromised by the treatment. I don't quite see how
this circle can be broken without knowing the true composition to begin
with. Since the samples are by definition of unknown composition it
seems difficult to adjudicate on the veracity of the resultant data in
either instance. I would argue that attempting to break this circle by
experiment using artificial mixtures would not be a true representation
of real samples, and that different results may be obtained from
different samples using different methods. 

 

I promise not to post any more messages on this subject!!!

 

Cheers,

 

Steve 

 

Department of Earth & Ocean Sciences
University of Liverpool
4 Brownlow Street
Liverpool
L69 3GP
UK

0151 794 5163/5164

**************************