Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Isoprime advice requested
From:
Bill Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:31:35 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<001d01c56c49$b3382220$9c6c6f80@paradisviking>
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_870318359==.ALT"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2518 bytes) , text/html (3462 bytes)
George,

What carbonate standard are you using?  We get different results with 
different standards, are you sure your standard is homogeneous?

Bill

At 12:47 PM 6/8/2005, you wrote:
>Good Morning Everybody,
>
>We're struggling to get good precision with our GV Isoprime/Dual 
>Inlet.  We are running 100ug carbonate samples/standards.  We've achieved 
>the specified +/-0.05 d18O (1 sd) on some runs, but it doesn't last.  Our 
>last 4 runs resulted in +/- 0.07, 0.12, 0.22, 0.09 d18O (1 sd).
>
>The mass spec seems to be working beautifully as indicated by the peak 
>shape, all open analysis, and single cold finger volume anlaysis with ref 
>gas on both sides of the dual inlet.
>
>We learned some techiques from our esteemed and helpful GV service 
>engineers regarding the carbonate prep line. These include replacing the 
>prep line and heating the prep line between runs.  We saw improvements in 
>performance, especially after heating the line.  Unfortunately, the good 
>data quality deteriorates quickly (several runs).  We've experimented with 
>heating the prep line continuously, heating between samples, and not 
>heating at all.  Our latest experiments involve replacing the 1/16" ss 
>prep line with fat tubing (1/4" convoluted ss tubing).  The fat tubing 
>showed promising results at first, but alas, has deteriorated again (above 
>data collected with fat tubing).
>
>I like the rapid pumpdown and definitive leak checking that the fat tubing 
>allows.  My thought was that the increased conductance and lower surface 
>area to volume ratio of the fat tubing would be a great benefit.
>
>When using 1/16" tubing, it is standard 316 ss tubing that is cut with a 
>dremel tool.
>
>Any ideas or suggestions for further testing would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Take care,
>Georges
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Georges L. Paradis
>ICPMS Lab Manager
>Department of Geological Sciences, Marine Science Institute
>Unviversity of California Santa Barbara
>Santa Barbara, CA 93106
>805-893-7182
><mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>

William J. Showers
Dept of Marine, Earth & Atm Sciences
Box 8208
North Carolina State University
Raleigh NC 27695

For express mail: 1125 Faucette Dr.

(919) 515 - 7143 Office
(919) 515 - 7802 Fax
(919) 515 - 3689 Lab
(919) 515 - 7911 Field Lab
[log in to unmask]

Visit our RiverNet Web Site
http://rivernet.ncsu.edu

`A`ohe lokomaika`i i nele i ke pāna`i.
(No kind deed has ever lacked its reward.)
Hawaiian Words of Wisdom



ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV