Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CO reference for TC/EA
From:
Simon Poulson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:09:33 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Dear all,

As a postscript to Steve's comments, I ordered a similar 2.5 purity tank of
CO from Praxair, but it turned out to have a very light composition.  I
received my CO from a Las Vegas distribution centre, so it's almost
certainly a different lot number.  Hence, by ordering CO in the US, you
might get lucky, and then again, you might not!

Cheers,
Simon



>     For what it's worth, we recently received a EuroVector EA and needed
>some CO quickly in order to set it up and test it for oxygen pyrolysis.
>The only thing we could come up with quickly was a 2.5 purity tank from
>Praxair.  To our surprise it had a very low background for water and O2 and
>not much of anything else showed up in the background scans.  In addition,
>it turned out to have a very workable d18O value of around +17 per mil.
>The delta value is just a rough estimate based on the value we get for our
>nitrate oxygen standard but it's certainly not off by hundreds of per mil.
>I have no idea if lower purity CO normally has such a workable oxygen
>composition or we were just lucky.  If it's the rule rather than the
>exception, maybe lower purity CO could be scrubbed for contaminants in the
>lab.  The Micromass engineer who installed our instrument  thought he
>remembered someone else having the same experience.
>
>Steven Silva
>U.S. Geological Survey

*****
Simon R. Poulson
Dept. of Geological Sciences, MS-172
University of Nevada-Reno
Reno, NV 89557-0138
USA
Phone: (775) 784-1104
Fax: (775) 784-1833
[log in to unmask]
*****

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV