Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: m/z 16 signal
From:
Paul Eby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:47:40 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>The nature of ionisation would make it extremely unlikely for two ions to
>'meet' and form a molecule.  The ions are relatively few and far between,
>at a very low pressure and have the same charge.  I've never seen water
>dissociating to form mass 16.  This would involve both H atoms being
>dislodged, so you'd expect to have a huge 18, a smaller 17 (H20 + e -> HO+
>+ H) and a smaller still 16 (HO+ + -> O+ + H).

We see exactly this on our Finnigan 252. When water is present (mass 18) we
always have a smaller mass 17 and an even smaller mass 16. Of course, this
isn't a quadropole....







Paul Eby

[log in to unmask]
Biogeochemistry Lab
School of Earth and Ocean Science
University of Victoria

phone: 250-721-6183
fax:   250-472-4620

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV