ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Paul Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 May 2006 10:21:11 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Dear colleagues,

I was just asked by someone who is setting up a lab how feasible it is to 
run mostly SO2 analysis on an isotope ratio mass spec, but also some O and 
D in water and N and C in organic material from a EA.  I don't do S 
analysis, but in the past my understand was that it was desirable to have a 
separate mass spectrometer for SO2 analysis if possible.  My understanding 
was that SO2 would gradually affect the source and the results for O in 
particular but possibly other more stable compounds would deteriorate 
compared to a system that does not run SO2.  However, with modern 
continuous flow systems perhaps this is not as great an issue.

Any advice on this would be appreciated.

Paul Brooks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2