Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
jurassic organic matter
From:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:30:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Working on the isotopic signature of Jutrassic organic matter, we got an
unknown referee that states that during the Jurassic terrestrial organic
matter was heavier (more positive) than marine organic matter.
So far the literature we know says the contrary.
Can anybody enlighten us on this controversy?
Thanks
antonio and elena

ps Can anybody send us the e-mail adress of Prof. Tyson at Newcastle? The
e-mail list does not include it!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV