Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SMOW-SLAP difference & spare VG 602 H/D magnet?
From:
Willi Brand <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
25 Sep 95 05:17:03 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Dear Jim O'Neill,
as the person responsible for the development of the isotope mass spectrometers
at the Finnigan factory in Bremen, I need to inquire about your statement that
one cannot "get anywhere near the correct dD value when it is large" with a
modern machine (Delta-S).
Being aware of the performance of a larger number of machines and with some
experience in measuring the SMOW/SLAP values both from equilibration and from
reduction experiments I simply cannot share your judgement. The contrary is the
case: we get very close to the -428 permil without scaling, using the
"questionable H3+ factors" determined in an automated fashion and applying the
correction for H3+ contribution as available in the software. If we are missing
"some important factor" we would very much like to be informed as early as
possible in order to keep a possible damage to data in the literature as small
as possible.
Willi Brand


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV