On 04/30/2012 02:22 PM, J. Greg Mackinnon wrote:
> Our email admins would have more authoritative info, but my
> understanding is that all email headers can be forged, so there would
> be no conclusive way to prove that a message was "authentic" from mail
> headers alone. Mail signatures might be useful here, or they may just
> confuse everyone to death. Hard to tell.
That's interesting. I'd think that if our mail servers were to see an
email from a spoofed UVM address, that they might cross-check to make
sure of that. So who are the UVM Email overlords anyway?