MEDLIB-L Archives

February 2007, Week 2

MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David P. Dillard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David P. Dillard
Date:
Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:39:50 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (109 lines)
The posts on this topic on this list have been both excellent and very
interesting.  I was most impressed, for example, by the wonderful and very
informative post from Margaret Allen.


I would like to mention a couple of things regarding comparative searching
capabilities between the two systems.


OVID facilitates searching groups of words on one or both sides of a
positional operator and the words can be replaced by search step numbers
that represent the word groups one wants searched with a positional
operator with another word, group of words or search step number.

4 adj8 6

To get the same result in EBSCO, one would need to search every single
pair of terms with their w operator for retaining words in the same word
order or the n operator for allowing one term to be on either side of the
other term.


OVID allows limiting to fields with the famous dot dot searching with the
ability to limit search steps to one field up to quite a few fields in one
search step.

baseball.ti,df,ab,tx.

With EBSCO one must limit to one field only in each search step and then
combine search steps with Boolean operators, usually the and operator.


To limit to subject in EBSCO one can only limit to one field in one step
and the options in EBSCO databases seem more limited than those provided
by OVID.

Consider the choices extended to the user when More Fields is selected by
someone searching MEDLINE in OVID:


 All Fields (af)
- or choose from among the following fields -
    ab: Abstract      			kf: Keyword Heading Word
    ax: Author Last Name     		lg: Language
    au: Authors     			sh: MeSH Subject Heading
    fa: Authors Full Name     		jc: NLM Journal Code
    rn: CAS Registry/EC Number/Name of Substance     nj: NLM Journal Name
    cm: Comments     			nw: NLM Journal Word
    cp: Country of Publication     	nm: Name of Substance Word
    dp: Date of Publication     	ot: Original Title
    ep: Electronic Date of Publication     pg: Page
    ed: Entry Date     			pn: Personal Name as Subject
    xs: Exploded Sub-Heading     	pa: Primary Author
    fs: Floating Sub-Heading     	pt: Publication Type
    gs: Gene Symbol     		ro: Record Owner
    gw: Gene Symbol Word     		rd: Revision Date
    no: Grant Number     		ms: Secondary Source ID
    is: ISSN     			sm: Space Flight Mission
    in: Institution     		hw: Subject Heading Word
    ir: Investigator     		tw: Text Word
    ip: Issue/Part     			ti: Title
    jn: Journal Name     		ui: Unique Identifier
    sb: Journal Subset   	  	up: Update Date
    jw: Journal Word     		vo: Volume
    kw: Keyword Heading


This is a very powerful collection of choices and hence in OVID for the
above reasons, one has much more control of their search and a wider range
of choices for obtaining tight on target searching than the search
capabilities of EBSCO permit at this point in time.


Nevertheless, if one must use EBSCO, one can get credible searches from
that databank if one does their searching carefully and is aware of what
works and what does not work in EBSCO.  I had very successful search on
the general topic of event planning at music festivals with a large body
of synonyms for each of these major facets to this topic.  A search
regarding long term memory and positive memories and drug addiction
relapse was also successful in EBSCO.   EBSCO works, but OVID has
important and useful tools not found in EBSCO at this point in time, so
those who both need powerful searching tools and the use of EBSCO,
SportsDiscus or both, may want to do some lobbying at EBSCO's doorstep.

I hope some on this list will find these observations useful to this
discussion of these two major databanks.  I am, perhaps, more dependent on
EBSCO than some on this list as I am also involved with tourism,
recreation, sports psychology and sports management as well as medicine at
Temple.



Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
(215) 204 - 4584
[log in to unmask]
Net-Gold
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold>
<http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html>
General Internet & Print Resources
<http://library.temple.edu/articles/subject_guides/general.jsp>
<http://www.learningis4everyone.org/>
<http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/ringleaders/davidd.html>
Digital Divide Network
<http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/jwne>
Educator-Gold
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Educator-Gold/>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2