Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MEDLIB-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MEDLIB-L Archives

July 1994, Week 4

MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MEDLIB-L Home MEDLIB-L Home
MEDLIB-L July 1994, Week 4

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Medical education software on Power Macs
From:
Debra Rand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Medical Libraries Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jul 1994 20:30:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At our institution, we are about to submit a proposal for our first
Macintosh computer.  (The hospital is all IBM).  My impression, after
speaking with a number of people over the last few months, is that the MAC
is still preferred for educational software, even though a number of
programs are now also available for Windows.
 
NOw that the the Power MACS have been out a few months, I'd like to know
how well most of the medical education software runs on them in comparison
to Quadra models.  Do programs run faster, slower, do they crash, etc.?
We will only have money for one machine and want to get the most out of it.
 
Also, there are AV models, as well as regular models.  I believe this is
true for the Quadra's as well as the Power MACS.  Is it advantageous to
purchase the AV model?
 
Please respond to me directly.  If there is interest I will summarize for
the list.
 
Thank you.
 
Debbie Rand
Long Island Jewish Med Ctr Library
New Hyde Park, NY
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV