MEDLIB-L Archives

January 2011, Week 3

MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"McCallum, Vivian" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
McCallum, Vivian
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:29:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I just read through this once, but it's ringing some bells in terms of how we participate in teaching article appraisal skills...choosing the best evidence.  Has anyone else had this reaction, and/or taken the thought further?
I'll have to read it again to be more specific...

Vivian McCallum, MLS, B.A.
Clinical Librarian
Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children
Child Development & Rehabilitation Evidence Centre
3644 Slocan Street
Vancouver, BC  V5M 3E8
ph. (604) 453-8300 ext. 8233
[log in to unmask]
Fax:  (604) 453-8301


-----Original Message-----
From: Medical Libraries Discussion List [mailto:] On Behalf Of Aspri, Jo-Anne
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: "No matter how many randomized clinical trials have been done on a particular topic, about half the clinical trials cite none or only one of them."

This job just keeps getting more and more interesting... http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/health/research/18cite.html

It concludes "There are several steps along the way to a published paper where researchers might be asked about already published papers on the same topic. Those who finance the research, the ethics committees that review some studies and the journals that publish the studies all could ask the investigators how they assured themselves they had found prior relevant results" but ...
"none of those groups feel any official responsibility."


Jo-Anne Aspri, MLS | LIBRARY | Kent Hospital | 455 Toll Gate Road | Warwick, RI 02886  | 401.737.7010 x1309 | jaspri AT kentri.org



________________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the information contained in
this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify sender by reply e-mail and
delete this message and any attachment(s) immediately. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2