LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for MEDLIB-L Archives


MEDLIB-L Archives

MEDLIB-L Archives


MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDLIB-L Home

MEDLIB-L Home

MEDLIB-L  November 2018, Week 4

MEDLIB-L November 2018, Week 4

Subject:

[bims-librar] 2018-11-25, eighteen selections

From:

Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 25 Nov 2018 01:02:23 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (679 lines)

bims-librar       Biomed news on Biomedical librarianship
─────────────────────────────┐
Issue of 2018‒11‒25          │ 
eighteen papers selected by  │
Thomas Krichel (Open Library │
 Society)                    │
 http://e.biomed.news/librar │
                             │
                             │
                             └──────────────────────────────────────────────────
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 1. Developing a systematic search strategy related to people with 
     disability: A brief report testing the utility of proposed disability 
     search terms in a search about opioid use.
 2. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online 
     health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
 3. Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information 
     by editing Wikipedia articles.
 4. The Congress Impact Factor: A proposal from board members of the World 
     Society of Emergency Surgeons.it (WSES) and Academy of Emergency Medicine 
     and Care (AcEMC).
 5. Parkinson's disease: Evolution of the scientific literature from 1983 
     to 2017 by countries and journals.
 6. [The evaluation of qualitative research published in nursing journals: 
     protocol of a cross-sectional study].
 7. The Contribution of Indian Endodontists in Rotary Endodontics to 
     Pubmed Database, from 2000-2017.
 8. An Informal Internet Survey on the Current State of Consciousness 
     Science.
 9. Analyzing paths from online health information seeking to colorectal 
     cancer screening using health literacy skills frame and cognitive 
     mediation model.
10. Top-cited articles in The American Journal of Obstetrics & 
     Gynecology: a bibliometric analysis.
11. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title 
     and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
12. Automatic Identification of Recent High Impact Clinical Articles in 
     PubMed to Support Clinical Decision Making Using Time-agnostic Features.
13. Using readability software to enhance the health literacy of equine 
     veterinary clients: An analysis of 17 Association of American Equine 
     Practitioners' Newsletter and Website Articles.
14. The Relationship between Health Literacy and Stages of Change in 
     Smoking Behavior among Employees of Educational Health Centers of Tabriz 
     University of Medical Sciences (2016).
15. Scientific production of Brazilian speech language pathologists in 
     sleep medicine.
16. Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic 
     Database Analysis.
17. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for 
     Tinnitus.
18. Focus on Peer Review: An Online Peer Review Course by Nature 
     Masterclasses : Nature Publishing Group. URL: https://masterclasses.nature.com/cours 
     es/205.

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

                     Disabil Health J. 2018 Nov 15. pii: S1936-6574(18)30241-3. 
 1. Developing a systematic search strategy related to people with 
     disability: A brief report testing the utility of proposed disability 
     search terms in a search about opioid use.
   Ioerger M, Flanders RM, Goss KD, Turk MA
  BACKGROUND: The varied use of the term "disability" in the scientific 
  literature makes it challenging to conduct systematic reviews of health 
  issues among people with disability. Utilizing general disability search 
  terms has been suggested as an efficient way to ensure a broad capture of 
  the literature related to disability.
   OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the utility of general disability terms 
  versus condition-specific terms, in the context of systematically searching 
  for articles related to disability and other conditions or issues, in this 
  case, opioid use.
   METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted using three databases. An 
  initial search of articles mentioning opioids and disability was conducted 
  employing the general search terms recommended by Walsh et al.1 The results 
  were then compared to 16 condition-specific searches. The proportion of 
  unique articles from each condition-specific search that overlapped with the 
  general search was assessed.
   RESULTS: There was very little overlap between the articles captured using 
  condition-specific search terms and the articles captured utilizing the 
  general search terms. The highest amount of overlap was for spinal muscular 
  atrophy at 33.3%, with the overall median proportion of overlap being 13.4% 
  (mean = 15.7%; SD = 11.7%).
   CONCLUSIONS: With a systematic search for articles about disability 
  associated with opioid use as an example, condition-specific search terms 
  capture a large proportion of articles not identified using general 
  disability search terms. Disability researchers should be aware of pitfalls 
  using general terminology and the importance of using disability-specific 
  search terms.
   Keywords: Disability; Literature search; Opioid
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.11.009
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470478

                       J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Sep 06. pii: S1477-5131(18)30498-4. 
 2. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online 
     health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
   Cisu TI, Mingin GC, Baskin LS
  BACKGROUND: Hypospadias is one of the most common genital anomalies. 
  Treatment of hypospadias requires surgical repair, usually in childhood. 
  Patients are increasingly using the internet to learn more about their 
  health or that of their children, which can often empower patients to make 
  well-informed healthcare decisions.
   OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate not only the 
  readability but also the quality and accuracy of available online health 
  information for the treatment of hypospadias.
   STUDY DESIGN: Search terms for hypospadias treatment were queried on major 
  search engines. Each website was classified into one of four categories: 
  institutional, commercial, charitable organization, or personal website. 
  Content on each website discussing treatment options was analyzed for 
  readability using three readability formulas. A validated tool, the DISCERN 
  instrument, was used to measure the quality of online health information 
  regarding hypospadias treatment. Accuracy was independently assessed by two 
  pediatric urologists on a 1-5 scale, in which 1 and 5 correspond to 0% and 
  100% of the information in the text being accurate, respectively.
   RESULTS: A total of 150 search engine results were acquired, of which 46 
  were analyzed for readability, quality, and accuracy. The mean readability 
  scores across all websites were 14.89 (Gunning-Fog), 11.01 Simple Measure of 
  Goddledygook (SMOG), and 8.44 (Dale-Chall), which correspond to an 11th- to 
  12th-grade reading level. Most websites (65.2%) were considered of 'good' 
  quality. Readability and quality scores were not statistically different 
  between website categories. Institutional and charitable websites had the 
  highest mean accuracy scores (3.91 and 3.50, respectively), with 
  institutional websites proving to have significantly more accurate 
  information regarding hypospadias treatment than commercial websites (3.91 
  and 3.42, respectively; P = 0.001).
   DISCUSSION: Pediatric urologists should know what information about 
  hypospadias and its treatment exists on the Internet and understand if it is 
  accurate and of good quality and, more importantly, if the material is 
  written at a reading level comprehensible by the majority of parents. 
  Limitations included analysis of only English-written websites regarding 
  hypospadias treatment specifically, using search engines alone rather than 
  other online resources, not evaluating online videos or illustrations, and 
  not using more than two pediatric urologists for determining content 
  accuracy.
   CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that online health materials regarding 
  hypospadias and its treatment are written at a level far greater than the 
  reading level of most adults. Most websites were considered of adequate 
  quality, and websites from institutions or references had significantly more 
  accurate information than those from commercial websites.
   Keywords: Accuracy; Hypospadias; Hypospadias treatment; Online health 
    information; Quality; Readability
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30449679

                                           BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20. 18(1): 265
 3. Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information 
     by editing Wikipedia articles.
   Apollonio DE, Broyde K, Azzam A, De Guia M, Heilman J, Brock T
  BACKGROUND: Pharmacy training programs commonly ask students to develop or 
  edit drug monographs that summarize key information about new medicines as 
  an academic exercise. We sought to expand on this traditional approach by 
  having students improve actual medicines information pages posted on 
  Wikipedia.
   METHODS: We placed students (n = 119) in a required core pharmacy course 
  into groups of four and assigned each group a specific medicines page on 
  Wikipedia to edit. Assigned pages had high hit rates, suggesting that the 
  topics were of interest to the wider public, but were of low quality, 
  suggesting that the topics would benefit from improvement efforts. We 
  provided course trainings about editing Wikipedia. We evaluated the 
  assignment by surveying student knowledge and attitudes and reviewing the 
  edits on Wikipedia.
   RESULTS: Completing the course trainings increased student knowledge of 
  Wikipedia editing practices. At the end of the assignment, students had a 
  more nuanced understanding of Wikipedia as a resource. Student edits 
  improved substantially the quality of the articles edited, their edits were 
  retained for at least 30 days after course completion, and the average 
  number page views of their edited articles increased.
   CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that engaging pharmacy students in a 
  Wikipedia editing assignment is a feasible alternative to writing drug 
  monographs as a classroom assignment. Both tasks provide opportunities for 
  students to demonstrate their skills at researching and explaining drug 
  information but only one serves to improve wider access to quality medicines 
  information. Wikipedia editing assignments are feasible for large groups of 
  pharmacy students and effective in improving publicly available information 
  on one of the most heavily accessed websites globally.
   Keywords: Curriculum; Pharmacy; Students, pharmacy; Wikipedia
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1375-z
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454046

                                                          F1000Res. 2018 ;7 1185
 4. The Congress Impact Factor: A proposal from board members of the World 
     Society of Emergency Surgeons.it (WSES) and Academy of Emergency Medicine 
     and Care (AcEMC).
   De Simone B, Ansaloni L, Kelly MD, Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, 
   Pisano M, Cervellin G, Baiocchi G, Catena F
  Many scientific congresses and conferences are held every year around the 
  world. The aim of the World Society of Emergency Surgeons.it (WSES) and 
  Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC) was to develop a simple 
  mathematical parameter as an indicator of academic quality and scientific 
  validity of a congress. In this opinion article, a new metric, the Congress 
  Impact Factor (IFc), is proposed taking into consideration the widely used 
  Impact Factor as an indicator of journals' prestige and using H-index 
  analysis. The IFc is derived from the mathematical ratio between the mean 
  H-index of invited lecturers normalized for lecture topic and number of 
  lectures in the conference. In case of multiple sessions, the mean of all 
  IFc is calculated along with its standard deviation.  We conclude that the 
  IFc can be a useful measure for evaluating and comparing congress prestige, 
  and may also represent a potentially useful parameter for improving academic 
  curriculum and helping participants to choose the more prestigious meetings 
  for their education.
   Keywords: Academic Curriculum; Congress Impact Factor; Educational 
    Program; HIndex; Scientific Quality
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15429.1
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467521

            Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Nov 10. pii: S1353-8020(18)30495-4. 
 5. Parkinson's disease: Evolution of the scientific literature from 1983 
     to 2017 by countries and journals.
   Robert C, Wilson CS, Lipton RB, Arreto CD
  This study charts the evolution of the scientific literature on Parkinson's 
  disease (PD) from 1983 to 2017 to inform communities of scientists, 
  physicians, patients, caregivers and politicians concerned with PD. Articles 
  published in journals indexed in the Science Citation Index-Expanded 
  database of the Web of Science were retrieved and analyzed in seven 
  five-year periods: 1983-1987, 1988-1992, 1993-1997, 1998-2002, 2003-2007, 
  2008-2012 and 2013-2017. Over 35 years the number of research papers on PD 
  increased 33-fold: 885 papers in 1983-1987 to 29,972 in 2013-2017. At the 
  same time the number of countries contributing to PD research increased from 
  37 to 131. The USA was the most prolific country throughout, followed by 
  several European (UK, Germany, Italy and France) and English-speaking 
  (Canada and Australia) countries. By 2003, several Asian countries (China, 
  South Korea, India and Turkey) emerged with rapid increases in publications 
  related to PD. By 2013-2017, China surpassed all but the USA to rank 2nd 
  globally in productivity. Despite an increase from 4 to 22 African countries 
  publishing PD research from 1983 to 2017, most were either unproductive or 
  contributed ≤5 papers in each five-year period. There has also been a 
  12-fold increase in the number of journals (232-2824) containing papers on 
  PD. In 2013-2017 three PD-focused journals (Parkinsonism & Related 
  Disorders, Movement Disorders and Journal of Parkinson's Disease) contained 
  6.8% of all PD papers while a large majority (82.5%) of journals 
  published ≤ 10 papers. This quantitative study complements the numerous 
  extant qualitative reviews to provide a global perspective on PD research.
   Keywords: Bibliometrics; Country productivity; Journal analysis; 
    Parkinson's disease; Publication growth
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.11.011
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455157

                                  Prof Inferm. 2018 Jul-Sep;71(3):71(3): 173-177
 6. [The evaluation of qualitative research published in nursing journals: 
     protocol of a cross-sectional study].
   Guarinoni MG, Storti M, Dignani L, Motta PC
  INTRODUCTION: The nature of nursing has prompted researchers nurses to use a 
  large number of qualitative methodology research. The trend showed a 
  substantial increase in its production between 1997 and 2000 to settle back 
  down in the following years although until recently the qualitative 
  methodology was considered a non-scientific research. The growing number of 
  publications with qualitative design is paid concern to verify the rigor and 
  credibility of studies using this method. The use of the quality assessment 
  tools showed that the methodological precision of studies with a qualitative 
  design has grown over time.
   AIM: Assessing, using the tool Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, the 
  quality of qualitative studies published in the last five years by 
  international nursing journals with higher impact factor.
   METHOD: We will search the qualitative articles published on the ten most 
  influential nursing journals that will be submitted by two independent 
  researchers at the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool in its original 
  version.
   EXPECTED RESULTS: The results make it possible to observe whether the 
  qualitative research produced in the field of nursing uses a rigorous 
  methodology in the drafting of the report, assuming that the quality has 
  grown in the past five years than in previous years.
   CONCLUSION: The study will help researchers assess which level reached 
  nurses in the development of qualitative research.
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2018.713173
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30457271

                      Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Oct 25. 6(10): 1878-1881
 7. The Contribution of Indian Endodontists in Rotary Endodontics to 
     Pubmed Database, from 2000-2017.
   Abraham S, Mehta DL, Bellad SC, Patil S, Kamble AB, Chaudhari S
  AIM: This study aimed at assessing the trends of publications of Indian 
  Endodontists in the field of rotary Endodontics in the PubMed database from 
  2000-2017.
   METHODS: The date of publication was set from 1st January 2000 to 31st 
  December 2017, wherein keywords entered in the advanced search were "Indian" 
  AND "Dental" AND "Rotary Endodontics". From the collected articles the 
  following criteria were noted: year of publication, the name of the journal, 
  status of the journal, name of the first author, state of origin and the 
  rotary Endodontic file system used.
   RESULTS: All data was subjected for statistical analysis by SPSS software 
  version 16. The data were subjected to chi-square test, and a statistically 
  significant difference (p < 0.001) was obtained in the inter-6 yearly 
  interval starting from 2000-2017; in the status of the journal; the state of 
  origin and in the generation of rotary files which were published during the 
  study period.
   CONCLUSION: The plethora of publications by Indian Conservative Dentists and 
  Endodontists is on the rise, and with the advent of better technology a 
  greater interest in the mechanics and properties of these rotary file 
  systems has invoked greater research work.
   Keywords: Endodontists publications; Indian-authors; PubMed; Rotary 
    Endodontics
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.402
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455767

                                                     Front Psychol. 2018 ;9 2134
 8. An Informal Internet Survey on the Current State of Consciousness 
     Science.
   Michel M, Fleming SM, Lau H, Lee ALF, Martinez-Conde S, Passingham RE, 
   Peters MAK, Rahnev D, Sergent C, Liu K
  The scientific study of consciousness emerged as an organized field of 
  research only a few decades ago. As empirical results have begun to enhance 
  our understanding of consciousness, it is important to find out whether 
  other factors, such as funding for consciousness research and status of 
  consciousness scientists, provide a suitable environment for the field to 
  grow and develop sustainably. We conducted an online survey on people's 
  views regarding various aspects of the scientific study of consciousness as 
  a field of research. 249 participants completed the survey, among which 80% 
  were in academia, and around 40% were experts in consciousness research. 
  Topics covered include the progress made by the field, funding for 
  consciousness research, job opportunities for consciousness researchers, and 
  the scientific rigor of the work done by researchers in the field. The 
  majority of respondents (78%) indicated that scientific research on 
  consciousness has been making progress. However, most participants perceived 
  obtaining funding and getting a job in the field of consciousness research 
  as more difficult than in other subfields of neuroscience. Overall, work 
  done in consciousness research was perceived to be less rigorous than other 
  neuroscience subfields, but this perceived lack of rigor was not related to 
  the perceived difficulty in finding jobs and obtaining funding. Lastly, we 
  found that, overall, the global workspace theory was perceived to be the 
  most promising (around 28%), while most non-expert researchers (around 22% 
  of non-experts) found the integrated information theory (IIT) most 
  promising. We believe the survey results provide an interesting picture of 
  current opinions from scientists and researchers about the progresses made 
  and the challenges faced by consciousness research as an independent field. 
  They will inspire collective reflection on the future directions regarding 
  funding and job opportunities for the field.
   Keywords: consciousness; consciousness research; consciousness science; 
    meta-science; survey
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02134
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455661

                   Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Nov 06. pii: S0738-3991(18)30970-4. 
 9. Analyzing paths from online health information seeking to colorectal 
     cancer screening using health literacy skills frame and cognitive 
     mediation model.
   Jin SW, Lee Y, Dia DA
  OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesized paths for Online Health Information 
  Seeking (OHIS) behaviors in developing health literacy, leading to 
  colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Korean Americans (KAs) using Health 
  Literacy Skills Frameworks (HLSF) and Cognitive Mediation Model (CMM).
   METHODS: A total of 433 KAs aged 50 through 75 in a metropolitan area in the 
  Southeastern U.S. completed a cross-sectional survey regarding 
  sociodemographics, OHIS behaviors, information overload, health literacy, 
  decisional balance, and CRC screening history. Path analyses were 
  implemented to assess the hypothesized causal models by examining the 
  relationships among these variables.
   RESULTS: OHIS was positively associated with information overload and health 
  literacy; information overload was negatively associated with health 
  literacy. Health literacy was positively associated with decisional balance; 
  decisional balance was positively associated with uptake of sigmoidoscopy 
  and colonoscopy.
   CONCLUSION: The findings supported both theoretical frameworks, HLSF and 
  CMM, for OHIS to develop health literacy, leading to CRC screening. These 
  findings highlight the significant roles of information overload and 
  attitudes and beliefs about screening in enhancing health literacy and CRC 
  screening among KAs.
   PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Practice efforts for facilitating CRC screening among 
  medically underserved older KAs should target improving access to and use of 
  OHIS and culturally-tailored health information delivery.
   Keywords: Cognitive mediation model; Colorectal cancer screening; Health 
    literacy; Health literacy skills frame; Online health information seeking; 
    Path analysis
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.002
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448041

                  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov 16. pii: S0002-9378(18)32116-1. 
10. Top-cited articles in The American Journal of Obstetrics & 
     Gynecology: a bibliometric analysis.
   Yadava SM, Patrick HS, Ananth CV, Rosen T, Brandt JS
  BACKGROUND: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) has had 
  a profound influence in nearly 150 years of publishing. A bibliometric 
  analysis, which uses citation analysis to evaluate the impact of articles, 
  can be used to identify the most impactful papers in AJOG's history.
   OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify and characterize the top-cited 
  articles published in AJOG since 1920.
   STUDY DESIGN: We used the Web of Science and Scopus databases to identify 
  the most frequently cited AJOG articles from 1920-2018. The top 100 articles 
  from each database were included in our analysis. Articles were evaluated 
  for several characteristics including year of publication, article type, 
  topic, open access, and country of origin. Using the Scopus data, we 
  performed an unadjusted categorical analysis to characterize the articles 
  and a two time point analysis to compare articles before and after 1995, the 
  median year of publication from each database list.
   RESULTS: The top 100 articles from each database were included in the 
  analysis. This includes 120 total articles; 80 articles listed in both and 
  20 unique in each database. Over half (52%) were observational studies, 9% 
  were RCTs, and 75% were from US authors. When the post-1995 studies were 
  compared to the articles published before 1995, articles were more 
  frequently cited (median 27 versus 13 citations per year, P <0.001), more 
  likely to be randomized (14.0% versus 4.8%, P=0.009) and more likely to 
  originate from international authors (33.3% versus 17.5%, P=0.045).
   CONCLUSIONS: Slightly more than half of the top-cited papers in AJOG since 
  1920 were observational studies and three-quarters of all papers were from 
  US authors. Compared to top-cited papers before 1995, the Journal's 
  top-cited papers after 1995 were more likely to be randomized and to 
  originate from international authors.
   Keywords: bibliometrics; case report; citation analysis; citation classic; 
    observational study; obstetrics and gynecology; randomized controlled 
    trial; top-cited
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1091
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30452887

                                                Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 20. 7(1): 200
11. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title 
     and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
   Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kleijnen J, Franco OH
  BACKGROUND: Researchers performing systematic reviews (SRs) must carefully 
  consider the relevance of thousands of citations retrieved from 
  bibliographic database searches, the majority of which will be excluded 
  later on close inspection. Well-developed bibliographic searches are 
  generally created with thesaurus or index terms in combination with keywords 
  found in the title and/or abstract fields of citation records. Records in 
  the bibliographic database Embase contain many more thesaurus terms than 
  MEDLINE. Here, we aim to examine how limiting searches to major thesaurus 
  terms (in MEDLINE called focus terms) in Embase and MEDLINE as well as 
  limiting to words in the title and abstract fields of those databases 
  affects the overall recall of SR searches.
   METHODS: To examine the impact of using search techniques aimed at higher 
  precision, we analyzed previously completed SRs and focused our original 
  searches to major thesaurus terms or terms in title and/or abstract only in 
  Embase.com or in Embase.com and MEDLINE (Ovid) combined. We examined the 
  total number of search results in both Embase and MEDLINE and checked 
  whether included references were retrieved by these more focused approaches.
   RESULTS: For 73 SRs, we limited Embase searches to major terms only while 
  keeping the search in MEDLINE and other databases such as Web of Science as 
  they were. The overall search yield (or total number of search results) was 
  reduced by 8%. Six reviews (9%) lost more than 5% of the relevant 
  references. Limiting Embase and MEDLINE to major thesaurus terms, the number 
  of references was 13% lower. For 15% of the reviews, the loss of relevant 
  references was more than 5%. Searching Embase for title and abstract caused 
  a loss of more than 5% in 16 reviews (22%), while limiting Embase and 
  MEDLINE that way this happened in 24 reviews (33%).
   CONCLUSIONS: Of the four search options, two options substantially reduced 
  the overall search yield. However, this also resulted in a greater chance of 
  losing relevant references, even though many references were still found in 
  other databases such as Web of Science.
   Keywords: Bibliographic; Databases; Information storage and retrieval; 
    Review literature as topic; Sensitivity and specificity
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0864-9
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458825

                      J Biomed Inform. 2018 Nov 20. pii: S1532-0464(18)30219-3. 
12. Automatic Identification of Recent High Impact Clinical Articles in 
     PubMed to Support Clinical Decision Making Using Time-agnostic Features.
   Bian J, Abdelrahman S, Shi J, Del Fiol G
  OBJECTIVES: Finding recent clinical studies that warrant changes in clinical 
  practice ("high impact" clinical studies) in a timely manner is very 
  challenging. We investigated a machine learning approach to find recent 
  studies with high clinical impact to support clinical decision making and 
  literature surveillance.
   METHODS: To identify recent studies, we developed our classification model 
  using time-agnostic features that are available as soon as an article is 
  indexed in PubMed®, such as journal impact factor, author count, and study 
  sample size. Using a gold standard of 541 high impact treatment studies 
  referenced in 11 disease management guidelines, we tested the following null 
  hypotheses: 1) the high impact classifier with time-agnostic features 
  (HI-TA) performs equivalently to PubMed's Best Match sort and a MeSH-based 
  Naïve Bayes classifier; and 2) HI-TA performs equivalently to the high 
  impact classifier with both time-agnostic and time-sensitive features 
  (HI-TS) enabled in a previous study. The primary outcome for both hypotheses 
  was mean top 20 precision.
   RESULTS: The differences in mean top 20 precision between HI-TA and three 
  baselines (PubMed's Best Match, a MeSH-based Naïve Bayes classifier, and 
  HI-TS) were not statistically significant (12% vs. 3%, p=0.101; 12% vs. 11%, 
  p=0.720; 12% vs. 25%, p=0.094, respectively). Recall of HI-TA was low (7%).
   CONCLUSION: HI-TA had equivalent performance to state-of-the-art approaches 
  that depend on time-sensitive features. With the advantage of relying only 
  on time-agnostic features, the proposed approach can be used as an adjunct 
  to help clinicians identify recent high impact clinical studies to support 
  clinical decision-making. However, low recall limits the use of HI-TA for 
  literature surveillance.
   Keywords: Clinical decision support; concept drift; evidence-based 
    medicine; literature database; machine learning; patient care
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.11.010
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30468912

                                                      Equine Vet J. 2018 Nov 17.
13. Using readability software to enhance the health literacy of equine 
     veterinary clients: An analysis of 17 Association of American Equine 
     Practitioners' Newsletter and Website Articles.
   Sheats MK, Royal K, Kedrowicz A
  BACKGROUND: Veterinarians often provide supplemental healthcare information 
  to horse owners via newsletters and website articles. However, articles 
  written above the reading level of the intended audience contributes to 
  misunderstanding. To ensure that the text in equine healthcare articles and 
  brochures is consistent with the literacy of clients, veterinarians can 
  adopt guidelines set forth by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and 
  the American Medical Association (AMA) for a target 6th grade readability 
  level.
   OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability levels of 
  a sample of American Association of Equine Practitioners' (AAEP) Newsletter 
  and Website Articles prepared expressly for veterinarians to download and 
  share with their clients. Examples from these handouts are used to 
  illustrate principles and techniques veterinary professionals can use to 
  align their writing with the literacy of their intended audience.
   STUDY DESIGN: Software-based readability analysis of 17 AAEP Newsletter and 
  Website Articles.
   METHODS: A free online readability calculator was used to generate a 
  consensus grade level readability score for 17 downloadable AAEP Veterinary 
  Newsletter and Website Articles.
   RESULTS: Sixteen of 17 articles were written above the recommended 6th grade 
  reading level.
   MAIN LIMITATIONS: We propose that a 6th grade readability level, as set 
  forth by the AMA, is a reasonable target for the diverse population that 
  makes up veterinary clients; however, there is currently no research that 
  establishes this target for veterinary clients and the American Veterinary 
  Medical Association (AVMA) has yet to issue a consensus statement on the 
  subject.
   CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the issue of client literacy and use of tools such 
  as readability analysis software can help veterinarians provide clients with 
  "easy to read" written materials that deliver a message that clients can 
  comprehend, thus improving their health literacy and empowering them as 
  partners in the veterinary-client relationship. This article is protected by 
  copyright. All rights reserved.
   Keywords: client education; horse; horse owner; literacy; medical writing; 
    readability
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13042
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447160

                                                      Int J Prev Med. 2018 ;9 91
14. The Relationship between Health Literacy and Stages of Change in 
     Smoking Behavior among Employees of Educational Health Centers of Tabriz 
     University of Medical Sciences (2016).
   Atri SB, Sahebihagh MH, Jafarabadi MA, Behshid M, Ghasempour M, Abri F
  Background: Health literacy has been considered as a predictor of starting, 
  maintaining, and stop smoking. However, such relations have not been well 
  documented in previous texts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to 
  investigate the relation between health literacy and changes in the behavior 
  of smoking in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
   Methods: In this correlational descriptive study, a total of 297 employees 
  of Tabriz health centers were examined. To collect data, a 
  demographic-social questionnaire, Iranian Health Literacy Questionnaire, and 
  DiClemente's behavior change questionnaire were used. Besides, SPSS 13 
  software (significance level = 0.05) was employed to analyze the data.
   Results: The average health literacy rate of participants was 70, and most 
  respondents had adequate health literacy. Nearly 41.1% were in the 
  precontemplation phase which is one of the stages of behavior change. There 
  was a positive and significant statistical relation between behavior change 
  variable with all health literacy areas (except the scope of understanding) 
  and total health literacy score (P = 0.011 and r = 0.147). The results of 
  ordinal regression analysis demonstrated that there is a significant 
  positive relationship between the score of health literacy and behavioral 
  change (b = 0.019, 95% confidence interval = (0.010-0.029), P < 0.001).
   Conclusions: Improving the level of health literacy can lead to change 
  people's behavior in relation to tobacco consumption. However, due to the 
  lack of relevant texts, there is a need for further studies in this field.
   Keywords: Health literacy; smoking; stages of change; transtheoretical 
    model
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_259_17
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30450174

                                    Sleep Sci. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):11(3): 183-210
15. Scientific production of Brazilian speech language pathologists in 
     sleep medicine.
   Corrêa CC, Kayamori F, Weber SAT, Bianchini EMG
  Introduction: Previous diagnosis and intervention in patients with 
  sleep-disordered breathing involves several health professionals. 
  Speech-Language and Hearing Sciences (SLHS) performance has been solidified 
  through scientific production.
   Objective: To describe the inclusion of Brazilian Speech-Language 
  Pathologists (SLP) in the field of sleep disorders, through the description 
  of studies, scientific publications and participation in scientific events.
   Data Synthesis: A search and an analysis of the Brazilian SLP publications 
  in the field of sleep disorders were carried out, including articles, 
  monographs, dissertations, thesis and abstracts published in annals of 
  events. The databases Lilacs, SciELO, Pubmed, Google Scholar tool and Lattes 
  platform were accessed, with final search in January 2018. The analysis 
  consisted of a description of the year of publication, type of publication, 
  area of the SLHS, place of publication and/or event. 40 articles were found 
  in national and international journals, from 1999 to 2017. In relation to 
  publications in books, one book about the subject was published in 2009 and 
  eight chapters of books were published. In the monograph format, 21 studies 
  were carried out, there are 13 dissertations and eight thesis. A total of 
  151 abstracts were published in annals of scientific events, from 2001 to 
  2017 and 63 lectures were conducted by SLP.
   Conclusion: The inclusion of Brazilian SLP in the area of sleep disorders 
  has been supported by scientific publications in the format of articles in 
  national and international journals, monographs, thesis, dissertations, 
  books and publications in event annals.
   Keywords: Hearing; Language; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Sleep Disorders, 
    Intrinsic; Speech
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20180033
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455851

                                                        J Food Sci. 2018 Nov 19.
16. Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic 
     Database Analysis.
   Urhan TK, Rempel HG, Meunier-Goddik L, Penner MH
  The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of 
  electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage 
  during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six 
  commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal 
  coverage and journal overlap. Databases were also evaluated with respect to 
  coverage of food science-based journals and the extent of article coverage 
  therein. A case study approach, focused on bile acid/dietary fiber 
  interactions, was used to illustrate the ramifications of database 
  selection/usage when dealing with specific research topics. Databases 
  differed with respect to the breadth of disciplines covered, the total 
  number of journals indexed, the number of food science discipline-specific 
  journals indexed, and the number of articles included per indexed journal. 
  All of the databases contained citations that were unique to the given 
  database. The data resulting from the case study provide an example of the 
  extent to which relevant information may be missed if pertinent databases 
  are not mined. In the present case, over half of the articles retrieved on 
  the focus research topic were unique to a single database. The combined data 
  from this study point to the importance of thoughtful database selection and 
  multiple database usage when comprehensively assessing knowledge in the food 
  sciences. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This paper provides insights into article 
  database usage for food science-relevant information retrieval. Online 
  information retrieval is an efficient way to assess current knowledge in any 
  of the food science disciplines. Acquired knowledge in turn is the 
  underpinning of effective problem solving; whether it be private sector- or 
  academic/government-based research.
   Keywords: databases; dietary fiber; food sciences; information retrieval; 
    research
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14388
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30452780

                                                  J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Dec 21.
17. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for 
     Tinnitus.
   Manchaiah V, Dockens AL, Flagge A, Bellon-Harn M, Azios JH, Kelly-Campbell 
   RJ, Andersson G
  BACKGROUND: Because of the wealth of information available on the internet 
  and increasing numbers of individuals relying on websites as a primary 
  source of information for health-related questions, it is important that the 
  readability of their content is within the comprehension level of most 
  readers.
   OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the quality and readability of 
  English-language Internet information for tinnitus.
   RESEARCH DESIGN: Analysis of Internet websites on tinnitus.
   STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 134 websites with tinnitus information.
   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three key words (i.e., tinnitus, ringing in 
  the ear, and buzzing in the ear) were entered in five country-specific 
  versions of the most commonly used internet search engine in August 2016. 
  For each of the 15 searches, the first 20 relevant websites were examined. 
  After removing duplicates, a total of 134 websites were assessed. Their 
  origin (commercial, nonprofit organization, government, personal, or 
  university), quality (Health On the Net [HON] certification and DISCERN 
  scores), and readability (Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kincaid Reading 
  Grade Level Formula, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) were assessed.
   RESULTS: Most websites were of commercial (49.3%) or nonprofit organization 
  (38.8%) origin. Their quality and readability was highly variable. Only 
  13.5% of websites had HON certification. χ² analysis showed that there was 
  significant association between website origin and HON certification [χ²(4) 
  = 132.9, p < 0.0001]. The mean DISCERN scores were 2.39. No association 
  between DISCERN scores and website origin was found. Readability measures 
  showed that on average, only people with at least 10-12 yr of education 
  could read and understand the internet information for tinnitus in websites. 
  Almost all the websites exceeded the most stringent reading level 
  recommended for health information.
   CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight great variability in the quality and 
  readability of health information, specifically for tinnitus in the 
  internet. These findings underscores the need for stakeholders (e.g., 
  web-developers, clinicians) to be aware of this and to develop more 
  user-friendly health information on websites to make it more accessible for 
  people with low literacy.
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17070
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461391

                                                     Can J Anaesth. 2018 Nov 19.
18. Focus on Peer Review: An Online Peer Review Course by Nature 
     Masterclasses : Nature Publishing Group. URL: https://masterclasses.nature.com/cours 
     es/205.
   Glezerson BA, Bryson GL
  
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1254-4
  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456627

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                              skype:thomaskrichel

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019, Week 3
September 2019, Week 2
September 2019, Week 1
August 2019, Week 5
August 2019, Week 4
August 2019, Week 3
August 2019, Week 2
August 2019, Week 1
July 2019, Week 5
July 2019, Week 4
July 2019, Week 3
July 2019, Week 2
July 2019, Week 1
June 2019, Week 5
June 2019, Week 4
June 2019, Week 3
June 2019, Week 2
June 2019, Week 1
May 2019, Week 5
May 2019, Week 4
May 2019, Week 3
May 2019, Week 2
May 2019, Week 1
April 2019, Week 5
April 2019, Week 4
April 2019, Week 3
April 2019, Week 2
April 2019, Week 1
March 2019, Week 5
March 2019, Week 4
March 2019, Week 3
March 2019, Week 2
March 2019, Week 1
February 2019, Week 4
February 2019, Week 3
February 2019, Week 2
February 2019, Week 1
January 2019, Week 5
January 2019, Week 4
January 2019, Week 3
January 2019, Week 2
January 2019, Week 1
December 2018, Week 5
December 2018, Week 4
December 2018, Week 3
December 2018, Week 2
December 2018, Week 1
November 2018, Week 5
November 2018, Week 4
November 2018, Week 3
November 2018, Week 2
November 2018, Week 1
October 2018, Week 5
October 2018, Week 4
October 2018, Week 3
October 2018, Week 2
October 2018, Week 1
September 2018, Week 5
September 2018, Week 4
September 2018, Week 3
September 2018, Week 2
September 2018, Week 1
August 2018, Week 5
August 2018, Week 4
August 2018, Week 3
August 2018, Week 2
August 2018, Week 1
July 2018, Week 5
July 2018, Week 4
July 2018, Week 3
July 2018, Week 2
July 2018, Week 1
June 2018, Week 5
June 2018, Week 4
June 2018, Week 3
June 2018, Week 2
June 2018, Week 1
May 2018, Week 5
May 2018, Week 4
May 2018, Week 3
May 2018, Week 2
May 2018, Week 1
April 2018, Week 5
April 2018, Week 4
April 2018, Week 3
April 2018, Week 2
April 2018, Week 1
March 2018, Week 5
March 2018, Week 4
March 2018, Week 3
March 2018, Week 2
March 2018, Week 1
February 2018, Week 4
February 2018, Week 3
February 2018, Week 2
February 2018, Week 1
January 2018, Week 5
January 2018, Week 4
January 2018, Week 3
January 2018, Week 2
January 2018, Week 1
December 2017, Week 5
December 2017, Week 4
December 2017, Week 3
December 2017, Week 2
December 2017, Week 1
November 2017, Week 5
November 2017, Week 4
November 2017, Week 3
November 2017, Week 2
November 2017, Week 1
October 2017, Week 5
October 2017, Week 4
October 2017, Week 3
October 2017, Week 2
October 2017, Week 1
September 2017, Week 5
September 2017, Week 4
September 2017, Week 3
September 2017, Week 2
September 2017, Week 1
August 2017, Week 5
August 2017, Week 4
August 2017, Week 3
August 2017, Week 2
August 2017, Week 1
July 2017, Week 5
July 2017, Week 4
July 2017, Week 3
July 2017, Week 2
July 2017, Week 1
June 2017, Week 5
June 2017, Week 4
June 2017, Week 3
June 2017, Week 2
June 2017, Week 1
May 2017, Week 5
May 2017, Week 4
May 2017, Week 3
May 2017, Week 2
May 2017, Week 1
April 2017, Week 5
April 2017, Week 4
April 2017, Week 3
April 2017, Week 2
April 2017, Week 1
March 2017, Week 5
March 2017, Week 4
March 2017, Week 3
March 2017, Week 2
March 2017, Week 1
February 2017, Week 4
February 2017, Week 3
February 2017, Week 2
February 2017, Week 1
January 2017, Week 5
January 2017, Week 4
January 2017, Week 3
January 2017, Week 2
January 2017, Week 1
December 2016, Week 5
December 2016, Week 4
December 2016, Week 3
December 2016, Week 2
December 2016, Week 1
November 2016, Week 5
November 2016, Week 4
November 2016, Week 3
November 2016, Week 2
November 2016, Week 1
October 2016, Week 5
October 2016, Week 4
October 2016, Week 3
October 2016, Week 2
October 2016, Week 1
September 2016, Week 5
September 2016, Week 4
September 2016, Week 3
September 2016, Week 2
September 2016, Week 1
August 2016, Week 5
August 2016, Week 4
August 2016, Week 3
August 2016, Week 2
August 2016, Week 1
July 2016, Week 5
July 2016, Week 4
July 2016, Week 3
July 2016, Week 2
July 2016, Week 1
June 2016, Week 5
June 2016, Week 4
June 2016, Week 3
June 2016, Week 2
June 2016, Week 1
May 2016, Week 5
May 2016, Week 4
May 2016, Week 3
May 2016, Week 2
May 2016, Week 1
April 2016, Week 5
April 2016, Week 4
April 2016, Week 3
April 2016, Week 2
April 2016, Week 1
March 2016, Week 5
March 2016, Week 4
March 2016, Week 3
March 2016, Week 2
March 2016, Week 1
February 2016, Week 5
February 2016, Week 4
February 2016, Week 3
February 2016, Week 2
February 2016, Week 1
January 2016, Week 5
January 2016, Week 4
January 2016, Week 3
January 2016, Week 2
January 2016, Week 1
December 2015, Week 5
December 2015, Week 4
December 2015, Week 3
December 2015, Week 2
December 2015, Week 1
November 2015, Week 5
November 2015, Week 4
November 2015, Week 3
November 2015, Week 2
November 2015, Week 1
October 2015, Week 5
October 2015, Week 4
October 2015, Week 3
October 2015, Week 2
October 2015, Week 1
September 2015, Week 5
September 2015, Week 4
September 2015, Week 3
September 2015, Week 2
September 2015, Week 1
August 2015, Week 5
August 2015, Week 4
August 2015, Week 3
August 2015, Week 2
August 2015, Week 1
July 2015, Week 5
July 2015, Week 4
July 2015, Week 3
July 2015, Week 2
July 2015, Week 1
June 2015, Week 5
June 2015, Week 4
June 2015, Week 3
June 2015, Week 2
June 2015, Week 1
May 2015, Week 5
May 2015, Week 4
May 2015, Week 3
May 2015, Week 2
May 2015, Week 1
April 2015, Week 5
April 2015, Week 4
April 2015, Week 3
April 2015, Week 2
April 2015, Week 1
March 2015, Week 5
March 2015, Week 4
March 2015, Week 3
March 2015, Week 2
March 2015, Week 1
February 2015, Week 4
February 2015, Week 3
February 2015, Week 2
February 2015, Week 1
January 2015, Week 5
January 2015, Week 4
January 2015, Week 3
January 2015, Week 2
January 2015, Week 1
December 2014, Week 5
December 2014, Week 4
December 2014, Week 3
December 2014, Week 2
December 2014, Week 1
November 2014, Week 5
November 2014, Week 4
November 2014, Week 3
November 2014, Week 2
November 2014, Week 1
October 2014, Week 5
October 2014, Week 4
October 2014, Week 3
October 2014, Week 2
October 2014, Week 1
September 2014, Week 5
September 2014, Week 4
September 2014, Week 3
September 2014, Week 2
September 2014, Week 1
August 2014, Week 5
August 2014, Week 4
August 2014, Week 3
August 2014, Week 2
August 2014, Week 1
July 2014, Week 5
July 2014, Week 4
July 2014, Week 3
July 2014, Week 2
July 2014, Week 1
June 2014, Week 5
June 2014, Week 4
June 2014, Week 3
June 2014, Week 2
June 2014, Week 1
May 2014, Week 5
May 2014, Week 4
May 2014, Week 3
May 2014, Week 2
May 2014, Week 1
April 2014, Week 5
April 2014, Week 4
April 2014, Week 3
April 2014, Week 2
April 2014, Week 1
March 2014, Week 5
March 2014, Week 4
March 2014, Week 3
March 2014, Week 2
March 2014, Week 1
February 2014, Week 4
February 2014, Week 3
February 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 1
January 2014, Week 5
January 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 3
January 2014, Week 2
January 2014, Week 1
December 2013, Week 5
December 2013, Week 4
December 2013, Week 3
December 2013, Week 2
December 2013, Week 1
November 2013, Week 5
November 2013, Week 4
November 2013, Week 3
November 2013, Week 2
November 2013, Week 1
October 2013, Week 5
October 2013, Week 4
October 2013, Week 3
October 2013, Week 2
October 2013, Week 1
September 2013, Week 5
September 2013, Week 4
September 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 2
September 2013, Week 1
August 2013, Week 5
August 2013, Week 4
August 2013, Week 3
August 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 1
July 2013, Week 5
July 2013, Week 4
July 2013, Week 3
July 2013, Week 2
July 2013, Week 1
June 2013, Week 5
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 3
June 2013, Week 2
June 2013, Week 1
May 2013, Week 5
May 2013, Week 4
May 2013, Week 3
May 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 1
April 2013, Week 5
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 2
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 5
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
March 2013, Week 1
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 3
February 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 1
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 1
December 2012, Week 5
December 2012, Week 4
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
November 2012, Week 1
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 3
October 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 5
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 4
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
July 2012, Week 2
July 2012, Week 1
June 2012, Week 5
June 2012, Week 4
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
June 2012, Week 1
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 5
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 4
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 5
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 2
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 4
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 4
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 5
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 2
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 5
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 5
August 2011, Week 4
August 2011, Week 3
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 5
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 3
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 5
June 2011, Week 4
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 5
May 2011, Week 4
May 2011, Week 3
May 2011, Week 2
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 5
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 3
April 2011, Week 2
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 3
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 5
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 5
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007, Week 5
December 2007, Week 4
December 2007, Week 3
December 2007, Week 2
December 2007, Week 1
November 2007, Week 5
November 2007, Week 4
November 2007, Week 3
November 2007, Week 2
November 2007, Week 1
October 2007, Week 5
October 2007, Week 4
October 2007, Week 3
October 2007, Week 2
October 2007, Week 1
September 2007, Week 5
September 2007, Week 4
September 2007, Week 3
September 2007, Week 2
September 2007, Week 1
August 2007, Week 5
August 2007, Week 4
August 2007, Week 3
August 2007, Week 2
August 2007, Week 1
July 2007, Week 5
July 2007, Week 4
July 2007, Week 3
July 2007, Week 2
July 2007, Week 1
June 2007, Week 5
June 2007, Week 4
June 2007, Week 3
June 2007, Week 2
June 2007, Week 1
May 2007, Week 5
May 2007, Week 4
May 2007, Week 3
May 2007, Week 2
May 2007, Week 1
April 2007, Week 4
April 2007, Week 3
April 2007, Week 2
April 2007, Week 1
March 2007, Week 5
March 2007, Week 4
March 2007, Week 3
March 2007, Week 2
March 2007, Week 1
February 2007, Week 4
February 2007, Week 3
February 2007, Week 2
February 2007, Week 1
January 2007, Week 5
January 2007, Week 4
January 2007, Week 3
January 2007, Week 2
January 2007, Week 1
December 2006, Week 5
December 2006, Week 4
December 2006, Week 3
December 2006, Week 2
December 2006, Week 1
November 2006, Week 5
November 2006, Week 4
November 2006, Week 3
November 2006, Week 2
November 2006, Week 1
October 2006, Week 5
October 2006, Week 4
October 2006, Week 3
October 2006, Week 2
October 2006, Week 1
September 2006, Week 5
September 2006, Week 4
September 2006, Week 3
September 2006, Week 2
September 2006, Week 1
August 2006, Week 5
August 2006, Week 4
August 2006, Week 3
August 2006, Week 2
August 2006, Week 1
July 2006, Week 5
July 2006, Week 4
July 2006, Week 3
July 2006, Week 2
July 2006, Week 1
June 2006, Week 5
June 2006, Week 4
June 2006, Week 3
June 2006, Week 2
June 2006, Week 1
May 2006, Week 5
May 2006, Week 4
May 2006, Week 3
May 2006, Week 2
May 2006, Week 1
April 2006, Week 4
April 2006, Week 3
April 2006, Week 2
April 2006, Week 1
March 2006, Week 5
March 2006, Week 4
March 2006, Week 3
March 2006, Week 2
March 2006, Week 1
February 2006, Week 4
February 2006, Week 3
February 2006, Week 2
February 2006, Week 1
January 2006, Week 5
January 2006, Week 4
January 2006, Week 3
January 2006, Week 2
January 2006, Week 1
December 2005, Week 5
December 2005, Week 4
December 2005, Week 3
December 2005, Week 2
December 2005, Week 1
November 2005, Week 5
November 2005, Week 4
November 2005, Week 3
November 2005, Week 2
November 2005, Week 1
October 2005, Week 5
October 2005, Week 4
October 2005, Week 3
October 2005, Week 2
October 2005, Week 1
September 2005, Week 5
September 2005, Week 4
September 2005, Week 3
September 2005, Week 2
September 2005, Week 1
August 2005, Week 5
August 2005, Week 4
August 2005, Week 3
August 2005, Week 2
August 2005, Week 1
July 2005, Week 5
July 2005, Week 4
July 2005, Week 3
July 2005, Week 2
July 2005, Week 1
June 2005, Week 5
June 2005, Week 4
June 2005, Week 3
June 2005, Week 2
June 2005, Week 1
May 2005, Week 5
May 2005, Week 4
May 2005, Week 3
May 2005, Week 2
May 2005, Week 1
April 2005, Week 5
April 2005, Week 4
April 2005, Week 3
April 2005, Week 2
April 2005, Week 1
March 2005, Week 5
March 2005, Week 4
March 2005, Week 3
March 2005, Week 2
March 2005, Week 1
February 2005, Week 4
February 2005, Week 3
February 2005, Week 2
February 2005, Week 1
January 2005, Week 5
January 2005, Week 4
January 2005, Week 3
January 2005, Week 2
January 2005, Week 1
December 2004, Week 5
December 2004, Week 4
December 2004, Week 3
December 2004, Week 2
December 2004, Week 1
November 2004, Week 5
November 2004, Week 4
November 2004, Week 3
November 2004, Week 2
November 2004, Week 1
October 2004, Week 5
October 2004, Week 4
October 2004, Week 3
October 2004, Week 2
October 2004, Week 1
September 2004, Week 5
September 2004, Week 4
September 2004, Week 3
September 2004, Week 2
September 2004, Week 1
August 2004, Week 5
August 2004, Week 4
August 2004, Week 3
August 2004, Week 2
August 2004, Week 1
July 2004, Week 5
July 2004, Week 4
July 2004, Week 3
July 2004, Week 2
July 2004, Week 1
June 2004, Week 5
June 2004, Week 4
June 2004, Week 3
June 2004, Week 2
June 2004, Week 1
May 2004, Week 4
May 2004, Week 3
May 2004, Week 2
May 2004, Week 1
April 2004, Week 5
April 2004, Week 4
April 2004, Week 3
April 2004, Week 2
April 2004, Week 1
March 2004, Week 5
March 2004, Week 4
March 2004, Week 3
March 2004, Week 2
March 2004, Week 1
February 2004, Week 5
February 2004, Week 4
February 2004, Week 3
February 2004, Week 2
February 2004, Week 1
January 2004, Week 5
January 2004, Week 4
January 2004, Week 3
January 2004, Week 2
January 2004, Week 1
December 2003, Week 5
December 2003, Week 4
December 2003, Week 3
December 2003, Week 2
December 2003, Week 1
November 2003, Week 5
November 2003, Week 4
November 2003, Week 3
November 2003, Week 2
November 2003, Week 1
October 2003, Week 5
October 2003, Week 4
October 2003, Week 3
October 2003, Week 2
October 2003, Week 1
September 2003, Week 5
September 2003, Week 4
September 2003, Week 3
September 2003, Week 2
September 2003, Week 1
August 2003, Week 5
August 2003, Week 4
August 2003, Week 3
August 2003, Week 2
August 2003, Week 1
July 2003, Week 5
July 2003, Week 4
July 2003, Week 3
July 2003, Week 2
July 2003, Week 1
June 2003, Week 5
June 2003, Week 4
June 2003, Week 3
June 2003, Week 2
June 2003, Week 1
May 2003, Week 5
May 2003, Week 4
May 2003, Week 3
May 2003, Week 2
May 2003, Week 1
April 2003, Week 5
April 2003, Week 4
April 2003, Week 3
April 2003, Week 2
April 2003, Week 1
March 2003, Week 5
March 2003, Week 4
March 2003, Week 3
March 2003, Week 2
March 2003, Week 1
February 2003, Week 4
February 2003, Week 3
February 2003, Week 2
February 2003, Week 1
January 2003, Week 5
January 2003, Week 4
January 2003, Week 3
January 2003, Week 2
January 2003, Week 1
December 2002, Week 5
December 2002, Week 4
December 2002, Week 3
December 2002, Week 2
December 2002, Week 1
November 2002, Week 5
November 2002, Week 4
November 2002, Week 3
November 2002, Week 2
November 2002, Week 1
October 2002, Week 5
October 2002, Week 4
October 2002, Week 3
October 2002, Week 2
October 2002, Week 1
September 2002, Week 5
September 2002, Week 4
September 2002, Week 3
September 2002, Week 2
September 2002, Week 1
August 2002, Week 5
August 2002, Week 4
August 2002, Week 3
August 2002, Week 2
August 2002, Week 1
July 2002, Week 5
July 2002, Week 4
July 2002, Week 3
July 2002, Week 2
July 2002, Week 1
June 2002, Week 5
June 2002, Week 4
June 2002, Week 3
June 2002, Week 2
June 2002, Week 1
May 2002, Week 5
May 2002, Week 4
May 2002, Week 3
May 2002, Week 2
May 2002, Week 1
April 2002, Week 5
April 2002, Week 4
April 2002, Week 3
April 2002, Week 2
April 2002, Week 1
March 2002, Week 5
March 2002, Week 4
March 2002, Week 3
March 2002, Week 2
March 2002, Week 1
February 2002, Week 4
February 2002, Week 3
February 2002, Week 2
February 2002, Week 1
January 2002, Week 5
January 2002, Week 4
January 2002, Week 3
January 2002, Week 2
January 2002, Week 1
December 2001, Week 5
December 2001, Week 4
December 2001, Week 3
December 2001, Week 2
December 2001, Week 1
November 2001, Week 5
November 2001, Week 4
November 2001, Week 3
November 2001, Week 2
November 2001, Week 1
October 2001, Week 5
October 2001, Week 4
October 2001, Week 3
October 2001, Week 2
October 2001, Week 1
September 2001, Week 5
September 2001, Week 4
September 2001, Week 3
September 2001, Week 2
September 2001, Week 1
August 2001, Week 5
August 2001, Week 4
August 2001, Week 3
August 2001, Week 2
August 2001, Week 1
July 2001, Week 5
July 2001, Week 4
July 2001, Week 3
July 2001, Week 2
July 2001, Week 1
June 2001, Week 5
June 2001, Week 4
June 2001, Week 3
June 2001, Week 2
June 2001, Week 1
May 2001, Week 5
May 2001, Week 4
May 2001, Week 3
May 2001, Week 2
May 2001, Week 1
April 2001, Week 5
April 2001, Week 4
April 2001, Week 3
April 2001, Week 2
April 2001, Week 1
March 2001, Week 5
March 2001, Week 4
March 2001, Week 3
March 2001, Week 2
March 2001, Week 1
February 2001, Week 4
February 2001, Week 3
February 2001, Week 2
February 2001, Week 1
January 2001, Week 5
January 2001, Week 4
January 2001, Week 3
January 2001, Week 2
January 2001, Week 1
December 2000, Week 5
December 2000, Week 4
December 2000, Week 3
December 2000, Week 2
December 2000, Week 1
November 2000, Week 5
November 2000, Week 4
November 2000, Week 3
November 2000, Week 2
November 2000, Week 1
October 2000, Week 5
October 2000, Week 4
October 2000, Week 3
October 2000, Week 2
October 2000, Week 1
September 2000, Week 5
September 2000, Week 4
September 2000, Week 3
September 2000, Week 2
September 2000, Week 1
August 2000, Week 5
August 2000, Week 4
August 2000, Week 3
August 2000, Week 2
August 2000, Week 1
July 2000, Week 5
July 2000, Week 4
July 2000, Week 3
July 2000, Week 2
July 2000, Week 1
June 2000, Week 5
June 2000, Week 4
June 2000, Week 3
June 2000, Week 2
June 2000, Week 1
May 2000, Week 5
May 2000, Week 4
May 2000, Week 3
May 2000, Week 2
May 2000, Week 1
April 2000, Week 5
April 2000, Week 4
April 2000, Week 3
April 2000, Week 2
April 2000, Week 1
March 2000, Week 5
March 2000, Week 4
March 2000, Week 3
March 2000, Week 2
March 2000, Week 1
February 2000, Week 5
February 2000, Week 4
February 2000, Week 3
February 2000, Week 2
February 2000, Week 1
January 2000, Week 5
January 2000, Week 4
January 2000, Week 3
January 2000, Week 2
January 2000, Week 1
December 1999, Week 5
December 1999, Week 4
December 1999, Week 3
December 1999, Week 2
December 1999, Week 1
November 1999, Week 5
November 1999, Week 4
November 1999, Week 3
November 1999, Week 2
November 1999, Week 1
October 1999, Week 5
October 1999, Week 4
October 1999, Week 3
October 1999, Week 2
October 1999, Week 1
September 1999, Week 5
September 1999, Week 4
September 1999, Week 3
September 1999, Week 2
September 1999, Week 1
August 1999, Week 5
August 1999, Week 4
August 1999, Week 3
August 1999, Week 2
August 1999, Week 1
July 1999, Week 5
July 1999, Week 4
July 1999, Week 3
July 1999, Week 2
July 1999, Week 1
June 1999, Week 5
June 1999, Week 4
June 1999, Week 3
June 1999, Week 2
June 1999, Week 1
May 1999, Week 5
May 1999, Week 4
May 1999, Week 3
May 1999, Week 2
May 1999, Week 1
April 1999, Week 5
April 1999, Week 4
April 1999, Week 3
April 1999, Week 2
April 1999, Week 1
March 1999, Week 5
March 1999, Week 4
March 1999, Week 3
March 1999, Week 2
March 1999, Week 1
February 1999, Week 4
February 1999, Week 3
February 1999, Week 2
February 1999, Week 1
January 1999, Week 5
January 1999, Week 4
January 1999, Week 3
January 1999, Week 2
January 1999, Week 1
December 1998, Week 5
December 1998, Week 4
December 1998, Week 3
December 1998, Week 2
December 1998, Week 1
November 1998, Week 5
November 1998, Week 4
November 1998, Week 3
November 1998, Week 2
November 1998, Week 1
October 1998, Week 5
October 1998, Week 4
October 1998, Week 3
October 1998, Week 2
October 1998, Week 1
September 1998, Week 5
September 1998, Week 4
September 1998, Week 3
September 1998, Week 2
September 1998, Week 1
August 1998, Week 5
August 1998, Week 4
August 1998, Week 3
August 1998, Week 2
August 1998, Week 1
July 1998, Week 5
July 1998, Week 4
July 1998, Week 3
July 1998, Week 2
July 1998, Week 1
June 1998, Week 5
June 1998, Week 4
June 1998, Week 3
June 1998, Week 2
June 1998, Week 1
May 1998, Week 5
May 1998, Week 4
May 1998, Week 3
May 1998, Week 2
May 1998, Week 1
April 1998, Week 5
April 1998, Week 4
April 1998, Week 3
April 1998, Week 2
April 1998, Week 1
March 1998, Week 5
March 1998, Week 4
March 1998, Week 3
March 1998, Week 2
March 1998, Week 1
February 1998, Week 4
February 1998, Week 3
February 1998, Week 2
February 1998, Week 1
January 1998, Week 5
January 1998, Week 4
January 1998, Week 3
January 1998, Week 2
January 1998, Week 1
December 1997, Week 5
December 1997, Week 4
December 1997, Week 3
December 1997, Week 2
December 1997, Week 1
November 1997, Week 5
November 1997, Week 4
November 1997, Week 3
November 1997, Week 2
November 1997, Week 1
October 1997, Week 5
October 1997, Week 4
October 1997, Week 3
October 1997, Week 2
October 1997, Week 1
September 1997, Week 5
September 1997, Week 4
September 1997, Week 3
September 1997, Week 2
September 1997, Week 1
August 1997, Week 5
August 1997, Week 4
August 1997, Week 3
August 1997, Week 2
August 1997, Week 1
July 1997, Week 5
July 1997, Week 4
July 1997, Week 3
July 1997, Week 2
July 1997, Week 1
June 1997, Week 5
June 1997, Week 4
June 1997, Week 3
June 1997, Week 2
June 1997, Week 1
May 1997, Week 5
May 1997, Week 4
May 1997, Week 3
May 1997, Week 2
May 1997, Week 1
April 1997, Week 5
April 1997, Week 4
April 1997, Week 3
April 1997, Week 2
April 1997, Week 1
March 1997, Week 5
March 1997, Week 4
March 1997, Week 3
March 1997, Week 2
March 1997, Week 1
February 1997, Week 4
February 1997, Week 3
February 1997, Week 2
February 1997, Week 1
January 1997, Week 5
January 1997, Week 4
January 1997, Week 3
January 1997, Week 2
January 1997, Week 1
December 1996, Week 5
December 1996, Week 4
December 1996, Week 3
December 1996, Week 2
December 1996, Week 1
November 1996, Week 5
November 1996, Week 4
November 1996, Week 3
November 1996, Week 2
November 1996, Week 1
October 1996, Week 5
October 1996, Week 4
October 1996, Week 3
October 1996, Week 2
October 1996, Week 1
September 1996, Week 5
September 1996, Week 4
September 1996, Week 3
September 1996, Week 2
September 1996, Week 1
August 1996, Week 5
August 1996, Week 4
August 1996, Week 3
August 1996, Week 2
August 1996, Week 1
July 1996, Week 5
July 1996, Week 4
July 1996, Week 3
July 1996, Week 2
July 1996, Week 1
June 1996, Week 5
June 1996, Week 4
June 1996, Week 3
June 1996, Week 2
June 1996, Week 1
May 1996, Week 5
May 1996, Week 4
May 1996, Week 3
May 1996, Week 2
May 1996, Week 1
April 1996, Week 5
April 1996, Week 4
April 1996, Week 3
April 1996, Week 2
April 1996, Week 1
March 1996, Week 5
March 1996, Week 4
March 1996, Week 3
March 1996, Week 2
March 1996, Week 1
February 1996, Week 5
February 1996, Week 4
February 1996, Week 3
February 1996, Week 2
February 1996, Week 1
January 1996, Week 5
January 1996, Week 4
January 1996, Week 3
January 1996, Week 2
January 1996, Week 1
December 1995, Week 5
December 1995, Week 4
December 1995, Week 3
December 1995, Week 2
December 1995, Week 1
November 1995, Week 5
November 1995, Week 4
November 1995, Week 3
November 1995, Week 2
November 1995, Week 1
October 1995, Week 5
October 1995, Week 4
October 1995, Week 3
October 1995, Week 2
October 1995, Week 1
September 1995, Week 5
September 1995, Week 4
September 1995, Week 3
September 1995, Week 2
September 1995, Week 1
August 1995, Week 5
August 1995, Week 4
August 1995, Week 3
August 1995, Week 2
August 1995, Week 1
July 1995, Week 5
July 1995, Week 4
July 1995, Week 3
July 1995, Week 2
July 1995, Week 1
June 1995, Week 5
June 1995, Week 4
June 1995, Week 3
June 1995, Week 2
June 1995, Week 1
May 1995, Week 5
May 1995, Week 4
May 1995, Week 3
May 1995, Week 2
May 1995, Week 1
April 1995, Week 5
April 1995, Week 4
April 1995, Week 3
April 1995, Week 2
April 1995, Week 1
March 1995, Week 5
March 1995, Week 4
March 1995, Week 3
March 1995, Week 2
March 1995, Week 1
February 1995, Week 5
February 1995, Week 4
February 1995, Week 3
February 1995, Week 2
February 1995, Week 1
January 1995, Week 5
January 1995, Week 4
January 1995, Week 3
January 1995, Week 2
January 1995, Week 1
December 1994, Week 5
December 1994, Week 4
December 1994, Week 3
December 1994, Week 2
December 1994, Week 1
November 1994, Week 5
November 1994, Week 4
November 1994, Week 3
November 1994, Week 2
November 1994, Week 1
October 1994, Week 5
October 1994, Week 4
October 1994, Week 3
October 1994, Week 2
October 1994, Week 1
September 1994, Week 5
September 1994, Week 4
September 1994, Week 3
September 1994, Week 2
September 1994, Week 1
August 1994, Week 5
August 1994, Week 4
August 1994, Week 3
August 1994, Week 2
August 1994, Week 1
July 1994, Week 5
July 1994, Week 4
July 1994, Week 3
July 1994, Week 2
July 1994, Week 1
June 1994, Week 5
June 1994, Week 4
June 1994, Week 3
June 1994, Week 2
June 1994, Week 1
May 1994, Week 5
May 1994, Week 4
May 1994, Week 3
May 1994, Week 2
May 1994, Week 1
April 1994, Week 5
April 1994, Week 4
April 1994, Week 3
April 1994, Week 2
April 1994, Week 1
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager