Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUNINET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUNINET Archives

January 1999

MUNINET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUNINET Home MUNINET Home
MUNINET January 1999

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: S46 & S48
From:
Jim Condos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:52:09 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
As an elected official...

Re: S46...
In South Burlington's case, our polls are already open 7am to 7pm so for us
their would be no change.

On the issue of automatically mailing absentee ballots to all registered
voters... it would be a foolish waste of money which I can assume most
cities/towns do not have extra lying around. There is a process in place,
let's make that work.

Re:S48...
I, too, would be very concerned about the potential for voter fraud UNLESS all
cities/towns were electronically linked.  And, who would pay for that link.

Both of these bills sound to me like they could be additional unfunded
mandates if passed.

Jim Condos
Vice Chair, SB City Council

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV