Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:21:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I will be anxiously awaiting more clarity on this issue, preferably via
written guidelines.
Just last week I received an application from someone who purchased a second
home here. The husband wants to vote in Vermont, the wife wants to vote in
South Carolina where their other home is located (no - there is no divorce
pending). He does not have a Vermont driver's license. If he wants to claim
Vermont as his residence, why shouldn't he have to get a Vermont driver's
license? In the meantime, should I add him to the checklist?
Naomi LaBarr, Vershire clerk/treasurer
----- Original Message -----
From: "dmarko" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: residency some more
> Hi All, Kathy De Wolfe and I have been grappling with these issues for
> the past few years. We are planning to begin a discussion that will
> hopefully result in a clearer and more consistent definition of residency.
> We have already been chatting with Clerks from Colchester and some of our
> other college towns
> and would love your input as well. Deb
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: Wilmington Town Clerk <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion
> Network<[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:07:58 -0400
>
>>For my two cents, I think there is a fairly simple legislative solution
>>that dovetails with the potential $10,000 fine or imprisonment penalty for
>>perjury. I wish there existed a statutory requirement that clerks
>>periodically report the voter checklist to the tax deparment as we do the
>>county courts. The idea is that if you are on the voter checklist and
>>saying you reside at an address, and you are also on the Grand List as
>>owning that address, you should be filing an HS-131. If you are not then
>>you are either evading taxes or you are fraudulently claiming residence.
>>It's in the interest of the tax department to do the enforcement. In my
>>town, the RESIDENT TAX RATE is HIGHER than the non-resident rate.
>>
>>Susie Haughwout - Wilmington
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Wallingford Town Clerk
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:29 AM
>>
>>
>> Hi Ulla, We will continue to have these questions until we have a clear
>> definition of "residency" - as it relates to the voter checklist. How can
>> a person in Vermont claim non-residence on the grand list for tax
>> purposes and yet register here to vote? Is that legal? We hear the
>> concern about the "integrity" of the checklist within the State, how
>> about the nation? Perhaps Deb will weigh in on this.
>>
>> Joyce Barbieri, Wallingford
>>
>
>
|
|
|