MUNINET Archives

April 2000

MUNINET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Penny Sherwood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:48:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
I'm in the process of taking legal action against an agency that has moved
trailers several times without a mobile home bill of sale.  It probably
won't do me any good but I'll have the satisfaction of trying.
Penny in Bristol
-----Original Message-----
From: Charleston TAX <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: Mobile homes


>Hi Kathy,
>
>I don't think that requiring the Bill of Sale would stop the problem of
>moving mobile homes around without the proper documentation.  Getting
>people to file the form is the main problem.  I know that mobile homes are
>not supposed to be moved without proof that the taxes are paid - but who
>checks???  We have them disappear all the time - to who knows where.
>
>What would be the purpose of requiring the form to be recorded?
>
>Jeannine
>
>
>At 03:35 PM 4/3/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>Would like some feedback from the Town Clerks in regard to changing the
law
>>so that a Uniform Bill of Sale for mobile homes would have to be recorded
>>rather than filed?  This has been brought up for discussion purposes.
>>Looking for the pros and cons.  You can reply via muninet, to myself
>>(525-6222), or Judy Hansen.  Really appreciate your taking the time.
>>
>>
>>Kathy White
>>Barton Town Clerk
>>8025256222
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2