MUNINET Archives

February 2006

MUNINET@LIST.UVM.EDU
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:14:34 -0500
Reply-To:
Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: GASB 34
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<43E0C86C.00000F.01908@CLERK>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Melissa Ross <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines) 
Hinesburg is also.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Juli Lax
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fw: Re: GASB 34


 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Juli Lax
Date: 02/01/06 09:39:12
To: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network
Subject: Re: GASB 34
 
Huntington uses GASB 34 also
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: John Cushing
Date: 02/01/06 09:38:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: GASB 34
 
Milton is using the GASB 34 requirements. John
 
 
 
 
 
From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:MUNINET@LIST
UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Patti Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: GASB 34
 
 
I am taking a quick poll on how many Towns may be using the GASB 34
accounting system?
 
 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2