MUNINET Archives

July 2006


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Ulla Cook <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:58:17 -0400
text/plain (23 lines)
I like the way they say a "simple signed and dated statement".  What of we 
do not know the people as they say they just moved to town?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wallingford Town Clerk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: residency some more

> Hi Ulla, Yes, Kathy DeWolfe replied directly to me with the following:
> "You cannot reject an application to the checklist ONLY because a person 
> claimed non residency on the homestead for property tax purposes at the 
> present time...." and for me to call and discuss this. She also said it 
> would be a good issue to take up with the legislature.
> I'll keep you posted. How'd you like the letter that came in the mail 
> today from DMV about the clerks writing residency letters for people 
> seeking a driver's license!
> Joyce Barbieri, Wallingford