As I say, some things that should be obvious... someone isn't going to get.
--Brian
   (he/him)


On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:14 AM Trey Cates - Director of Technology <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Right now we are dealing with a potential abuse of family contact
> information being used by an exited employee to advertise non-school
> sponsored activities and events.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Trey Cates
> Director of Technology
> [log in to unmask]
> Central Vermont Supervisory Union
> 111B Brush Hill Road
> Williamstown, VT 05679
>
> (802) 433-5818 ext. 1887
> (802) 433-7087 (My Direct Line)
> (802) 433-7095 (Technology Team Help Desk)
> (802) 433-5825 (Fax)
>
> BOOK AN APPOINTMENT ONLINE: CLICK HERE
> <https://calendar.app.google/GN3AGnTvSsvLW9uT8>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:55 AM Brian Wightman <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> To more specifically address the question, I think having a clear policy
>> about what can and can't be taken is important. Some things you'd think
>> would be clear can be misunderstood. For instance, a special educator may
>> feel that a particular evaluation is a good example of their work, and that
>> if "all identifying information" is removed there is no harm in using it.
>> But of course in Vermont it's relatively easy to recognize a student from
>> their evaluation.
>> --Brian
>>    (he/him)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:31 AM Brian Wightman <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In previous conversations I know people have spoken of preserving access
>>> for a set time, and then archiving materials. Teachers, at least, have
>>> significant investment of their own work--lesson plans and teaching
>>> materials--online, such that transferring it all is more than a couple
>>> hours work. So preserving access for a time is reasonable. But cutting off
>>> access eventually is also reasonable.
>>> --Brian
>>>    (he/him)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:14 AM Derrick Garceau <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Interested in this as well. In the past, we have been very
>>>> accommodating to staff. However, I'd like to clamp down. What if there is
>>>> student information or other sensitive information in their drive? How
>>>> would we know? Whose responsibility is it to go through their drive to
>>>> determine that?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 3:54 PM Trey Cates <
>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does your district/school have a written policy that states what data
>>>>> an employee may take with them when their employment ends? For example, may
>>>>> employees "take" Google Drive files, emails, etc.? Is there a
>>>>> process/policy that limits what information an employee can leave with? Do
>>>>> you have any time limits where their data is no longer accessible? If you
>>>>> have anything written that covers these questions would you be willing to
>>>>> share?
>>>>>
>>>>> Trey Cates
>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>> CVSU
>>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Search <http://list.uvm.edu/archives/school-it.html> the SCHOOL-IT
>>>> Archive
>>>>
>>>> Manage <http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SCHOOL-IT&A=1> your
>>>> Subscription to SCHOOL-IT
>>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Search <http://list.uvm.edu/archives/school-it.html> the SCHOOL-IT
>> Archive
>>
>> Manage <http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SCHOOL-IT&A=1> your
>> Subscription to SCHOOL-IT
>>
>
> *This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged information for the use of the designated recipients. If you
> have received this communication by mistake, please destroy and contact the
> sender.*
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Search <http://list.uvm.edu/archives/school-it.html> the SCHOOL-IT Archive
>
> Manage <http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SCHOOL-IT&A=1> your
> Subscription to SCHOOL-IT
>