Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:54:55 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We tested the HP wireless and the Sonicwall, we opted for the Sonicwall
due in part because of price, but they also have better coverage area.
We use only HP switches. HP provides design and support. Not sure about
training, but I am pretty sure they do.
From: School Information Technology Discussion
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Patricia Aigner
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: HP Layer 3 switch advice
Dear Colleagues,
Have any of you purchased HP Layer 3 switches? I am working on a major
network upgrade and have priced two vendors. Cisco is significantly
more expensive and has ongoing SMARTnet costs. HP has great pricing and
the modules I am looking for but not the professional development and
training as far as I can see.
I have 1 GB internet with capacity to turn up to 10 GB.
I am looking at:
* Procurve 530 Access points
* Procurve Wireless Edge Module
* HP Procurve 5412zl-96G Intelligent Edge Switch
(includes 4 24 Port 10/100/100 PoE J8702A modules and 2 875W J8717A
power supplies)
Or
* Catalyst 6500/Cisco 7600 Supervisor 720 Fabric
* Cisco Access points
Pros and cons....
Anyone using HP.....
Patricia Aigner
Rutland City Public Schools
6 Church Street
Rutland, VT 05701
802-786-1957
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
This email may contain information protected under the Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) or the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). If this email contains
confidential and/or privileged health or student information and you
are not entitled to access such information under FERPA or HIPAA,
federal regulations require that you destroy this email without
reviewing it and you may not forward it to anyone.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, ClamAV and Bitdefender and is
believed to be clean.
|
|
|