SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

August 2012

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:56:41 -0400
Reply-To:
Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain
From:
Jim West <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Such "dissident" themes serve to hype fear of poliovirus, 

despite claims of poliovirus isolation found false,
http://www.harpub.co.cc/misc/OstromParalyticpolio.htm

despite obvious polio toxicology omitted from the mainstream polio paradigm.
http://harpub.co.cc/overview.htm

With toxicology avoided, the claim for virus causation can go nowhere.

The article below claims that acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) incidence rose in 
proportion to the doses of oral vaccine administered.  

That is not surprising, since changing diagnostics (from polio to AFP) to 
promote or protect vaccine programs, would give the impression of rising AFP 
incidence.

If there are high levels of mercury etc in the oral vaccine (as these may be 
faulty vaccines dumped on the Indian market) then sure, I'd agree the vaccine 
was causative.

Jim West
NYC

=====
Thanks Mitch for posting the text to this article, that I dispute:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/08/28/polio-eradication-
campaign.aspx?e_cid=20120828_DNL_artNew_1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2