Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:59:07 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<001401c755ef$8c0b1630$0302a8c0@acerda113ca325> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One way of dealing with this is to set up an SftP website with
different categories, especially one on Genes, Race & Intelligence.
Could also include an overview section of SftP's critiques of
science, PDFs of magazines, etc.
Another way is to set up a separate discussion list on this issue, if
people feel they'd prefer that it not be so dominant on this one.
Mitchel
At 02:36 PM 2/21/2007, you wrote:
>I do find it hard to disagree with George. I ,as it seems Maurice
>and Herb have done, would try to persuade him not to leave. I
>believe MIchael's position on thse issues is in fact undeveloped and
>it may not be possible to win him over to recognising that science
>is not the value free neutral proposition he seems to have trust in.
>Let alone his unfamiliarity with the very large critical literature
>on race and IQ including of course the special issues of SFTP and
>subsequent publications from SftP on biological determinism. Still...
|
|
|