LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  April 2007

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE April 2007

Subject:

Fwd: Victory in Disciplined Minds case

From:

Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 21:11:01 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (201 lines)

From: Denis Rancourt <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Victory in Disciplined Minds case
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:03:51 -0400


Dear fellow physicist,

Your courage to take a public stand on a close-to-home issue has
won justice for a fired fellow physicist and has promoted free
expression within the physics community.

Over five years ago we sent you an appeal beginning: "Physics
Today magazine recently gave a punishing review to a book written
by physicist Jeff Schmidt..."[1]  For 19 years Jeff was a staff
editor at our professional journal, Physics Today -- until his
supervisors saw his book Disciplined Minds.  Based upon examples
from physics graduate training and beyond, it provocatively
critiques workplace hierarchy in general and the politically
subordinate role of people hired to do creative work.[2]  The
magazine's review: "...[they] fired him."

The resulting appeal to physicists and others landed in fertile
soil and, through your efforts, justice has finally been done.
You will not read about it in Physics Today, and so we are
writing now to give you the story and to thank you for your
support.

Your public response, from over 35 countries, was unprecedented.
More than 1000 scientists, activists, and others in many fields
-- including the largest number of physicists ever to speak out
on a freedom-of-expression issue in the United States -- sent the
American Institute of Physics (AIP), which publishes Physics
Today, strongly worded demands for justice, all now public.[3]  A
human-rights committee of scientists affiliated with a unit of
the IEEE investigated and issued a public report[4] condemning
Jeff's dismissal.

Bringing such public judgment on Jeff's firing was already a form
of justice because of the toll on AIP's image.  Such punitive
justice is available to any wronged individual unafraid to go
public.  Jeff deeply appreciates and thanks you for your
support.[2]  You can contact him at [log in to unmask]

*Compensatory justice*

Encouraged by your passionately expressed view that our
institutions should uphold our community values, we continued the
campaign for free expression -- with the goal of compensatory
justice.

We took your protests to the American Physical Society, which
plays a major role in governing AIP, and asked[5] the
organization to oppose Jeff's dismissal, as it does when
dissident physicists outside the United States are punished for
expressing their views.  APS officials, in what amounts to tacit
approval of Jeff's firing, refused even to investigate the same
issue close to home.  This prompted us to urge Jeff to take legal
action.

Hence, Jeff approached the most prominent Washington, D.C.,
civil-rights law organization, which, impressed by your protests,
took the case pro bono publico.  ("That's Latin for 'free,'" says
Jeff.)  The lawyers filed suit[6] and obtained internal AIP
documents.  After AIP handed over the embarrassing and
incriminating documents -- which are now public[7] -- it
capitulated and signed a legally binding settlement agreement.
Some highlights:

1.  Payment.  AIP paid Jeff what we estimate[8] to be at least
half a million dollars.

2.  Public settlement.  AIP agreed to Jeff's demand that the
settlement agreement be a public document.[9]

3.  Symbolic reinstatement.  AIP reinstated Jeff to his position
at Physics Today magazine.[10]  A few hours later Jeff resigned.

4.  Public statement by AIP.  The American Institute of Physics
publicly acknowledged that Jeff's supervisors and others praised
his work and that AIP fired him for his provocative
expression.[11]

5.  Employment reference.  AIP has given Jeff a positive
reference letter.[12]

6.  Discrimination remediation.  While employed at Physics Today,
Jeff led a contentious effort to force the magazine to change its
long-standing pattern of hiring and training only whites as
editors, and to live up to its claim of being an affirmative-
action employer.  These actions were part of the expression for
which Jeff was fired.[6,13]  Thus, to settle the case, AIP
agreed[14] to...

..Support the National Society of Black Physicists (NSBP) and
the National Society of Hispanic Physicists (NSHP) in becoming a
member society of AIP and appointing a member of the AIP
governing board.

..Encourage each of the ten AIP member societies to work with
the NSBP and NSHP diversity council.

..Offer a science-writing course at an NSBP annual conference,
which will increase the pool of talented minority-group editors.

..Maintain a program of mandatory diversity training for all AIP
employees.

*Freedom of expression not embraced*

Although AIP's repressive behavior backfired, the organization
has not welcomed free expression within the physics community.
To settle the case, AIP demanded various censorships, including
deleting text from critical articles published by the American
Physical Society and by the Canadian Undergraduate Physics
Journal.[15]  AIP's behavior prompted the Canadian Undergraduate
Physics Journal to lodge a strong, public protest.[16]  It is
posted at
<http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/chronology/aipletter.pdf>

After the settlement, the American Institute of Physics,
represented by the notorious union-busting law firm Jackson
Lewis, slapped Jeff with a half-million-dollar legal action[17]
to silence him and to prevent physicists from discussing the
settlement.  AIP claimed that snippets of text posted at the
disciplinedminds.com website (such as the two words, "symbolic
reinstatement," and the five words, "Schmidt's concessions to
AIP's demands") each did $20,000 worth of damage to AIP, for a
total of half a million dollars.  AIP told Jeff that it would
stop its legal action if he removes those phrases from the web
and refrains from "all commentary regarding the settlement."  We
therefore regard AIP's legal filing as a SLAPP action (strategic
lawsuit against public participation), one whose primary purpose
is to stifle discussions of public interest.

We found this repressive behavior unacceptable for an institution
of physics, which should show the public that physicists come to
the truth through free discussion, not through censorship and
intimidation.  We wrote to AIP twice[18] demanding that it drop
its SLAPP action and reverse the censorship of articles published
by the American Physical Society and the Canadian Undergraduate
Physics Journal.

AIP has not undone the censorship or compensated Jeff for the
legal costs of defending against its SLAPP action, but -- in
another victory for free expression -- AIP announced, in its
response to our letters, that it would stop pursuing the legal
action.

*We would like to hear from you*

Thank you for taking a public stand.

We hope that you will share your thoughts with us.  Please share
your thoughts with AIP too.  (Send us a copy and, with your
permission, we'll post it on the web.)  Do let us know if you
would like to know about further developments in this case or
about similar cases.  You can reach us at [log in to unmask]
(Denis Rancourt), and you can reach AIP at [log in to unmask]
(AIP governing board chair Mildred Dresselhaus).

Sincerely,

Denis Rancourt for

Fay Dowker, Physics Department, Imperial College London, UK
Sanjoy Mahajan, Physics Department, University of Cambridge, UK
Talat Rahman, Physics Department, University of Central Florida
Denis Rancourt, Physics Department, University of Ottawa, Canada
George Reiter, Physics Department, University of Houston

-------------------------

References
(Copy addresses into browser)

1. 
<http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/Schmidt/protests.htm>
2. <http://disciplinedminds.com>
3. <http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/Schmidt/index.htm>
4. 
<http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/Schmidt/investigation.htm>
5. 
<http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/chronology/APSXappealX--Xsarachik.html>
6. 
<http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/Schmidt/complaint.htm>
7. <http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/discovery/>
8. <http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/coverage/sgr2006.pdf>
9. <http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/>
10. <http://disciplinedminds.com/settlement-a-performed.pdf>
11. <http://disciplinedminds.tripod.com/settlement.htm/>
12. <http://disciplinedminds.com/settlement-c.pdf>
13. 
<http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/discovery/07%20(D1457-1458).PDF>
14. <http://www.washlaw.org/news/releases/032006.htm>
15. <http://disciplinedminds.tripod.com/>
16. 
<http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/chronology/aipletter.pdf>
17. <http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/slapp/slapp.pdf>
18. <http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/slapp/anti-slapp1.pdf>
and <http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/schmidt/slapp/anti-slapp2.txt>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager