LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  November 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE November 2003

Subject:

Shiva / River Linking Project / Nov 18

From:

Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:10:57 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (238 lines)

--> If you pass this comment along to others please explain that
Commentaries are a premium sent to Sustainer Donors of Z/ZNet and
that to learn more folks can consult ZNet at http://www.zmag.org

==================================

ZNet Commentary
River Linking Project November 18, 2003
By Vandana Shiva

The Indian river linking project of Rs. 560,000 crore ($200b) has now
been elevated to the level of a creation myth by referring to it as
"Amrit Kranti", invoking the imagery of Sagar Manthan - the creation
story of Indian mythology in which the gods and demons churned the
ocean which led to the separation of the "amrit" (nectar) from the
"Vish" (poison). This is the symbolism with which the project is
referred to in the new brochure produced by the Task Force on
Interlinking of Rivers.

It was also the metaphor used by Shri Suresh Prabhu, Chairman of the
Task Force, at the C.I.I. organized meeting "Interlinking Rivers: A
win-win situation" on October 29, 2003. While mythic imagery is being
used to promote the project, the debate on River Linking has been
presented as emotion vs science -- those raising ecological and
social issues are defined as "emotional" and they have to be
convinced by the "science" of river linking.

However, the river linking project seems to be based on pseudo
science, not science.

The flawed science becomes evident in the first link that is to be
implemented in the River Linking Project -- the Ken-Betwa link, in
the Bundelkhand region of U.P. and M.P.

At his speech on Independence Day, August 15, 2003, from the
historical Red Fort in Delhi, the Prime Minister promised that the
ambitious project to link all major rivers of the country will start
by the end of this year. While the first project will link the Ken
and Betwa rivers in Madhya Pradesh, the second will connect the
Parvati, Kalisindh and Chambal rivers in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan.

The prioritisation of the Ken-Betwa link was also reiterated by
Suresh Prabhu at the CII meeting on river linking.

The Research Foundation for Science, Technology and ecology has
carried out an assessment of the Ken-Betwa link-- on hydrological,
ecological and social criteria. This case study provides a framework
for assessments of other river links.



The myth of "Surplus Waters"

At the core of the science of river linking is the idea that water
will be diverted from "surplus" rivers to "deficit" rivers, thus
ameliorating floods and drought and improving food security by
creation of new irrigation facilities. However, in the case of the
Ken-Betwa link none of these assumptions hold.

Ken is the smaller of the two rivers. Water is being diverted from
the basin draining 5344 MCM to a larger basin draining 9130 MCM. On
what criteria is the smaller river surplus and the larger river
deficit? The criteria is clearly not based on science and ecology.
The "surplus" basin is a river system which has been used
sustainably. The "deficit" basin is one in which water resources have
been used non-sustainably, and the demand has been allowed to
outstrip sustainable supply. It would therefore be more accurate to
refer to sustainable and non-sustainable water use in river basins,
rather than surplus and deficit rivers.

In any case, the assessment of "surplus" waters in Ken river
available for diversion to Betwa is scientifically flawed. The
Ken-Betwa project is based on diverting 1020 MCM of water from the
Ken river to the Betwa river. However, according to Madhya Pradesh
Government's comment on the National Water Development Agency report
of 1995 on the feasibility report of Ken-Betwa link, "the next
quantity of water from Ken Basin to Betwa Basin is 342 MCM only.....
Hence, it is recommended that Ken-Betwa link project may be dropped".

A project that the government itself recommended be dropped has
suddenly became the priority scheme in the new "Amrit Kranti" of
river linking.

The primary benefit of the project is claimed to be reduction of
floods and drought and increased irrigation. However, both Ken and
Betwa arise in the Vindhyachal range. When one river is in flood the
other is in flood. When one basin experiences drought, the other
experiences drought. Therefore, the claim of reducing flood and
drought impact does not hold. Floods will in fact actually increase
by adding more water to the Betwa which already affects Hamirpur
district with the highest food occurrence in Bundelkhand. 360201 ha
land, 262337 persons and 160 villages in Hamirpur are flood prone.
Adding more water to the Betwa basin will increase the flood
proneness of these villages.

The river link will also increase drought in the Ken basin. Banda
district experiences scarcity of water in summer season due to
decrease in the level of water in Ken river which is the main source
of drinking water and irrigation in the district. The diversion will
also drain water from indigenous water systems including Sarori Tal,
Gora Tal and Gajadhar Tal in Naugaon village, Sukh Sagar in
Maharajpur, Kotra Tal and Dhanera Tal in Palera, Nandsagar in
Isanagar, Bahast Tal in Jatara. These water systems were built by the
Bundelas and have had a major role in drought proofing in the
Bundelkhand region.

The only benefit of the river link is to provide water to 4 dam
projects in the Betwa basin which have been rendered infeasible due
to non-availability of water. These failed dam projects are Barari,
Neemkheda, Richwan and Kesuri dams.

These failed dams are the "target command" of the Ken-Betwa link. As
the project report states "With the transfer of water form Ken to
Betwa river these four projects of the upper Betwa basin can be taken
up. Otherwise these projects cannot be implemented due to shortage of
water in Betwa Basin". Instead of shelving projects for which water
is not available, these non-sustainable projects are being made
artificially viable by rendering the Ken basin ecologically and
economically unviable.



The ecological costs of the river link

The Ken-Betwa link involves building a dam on Daudhan on Ken river,
and diverting the water to Betwa. The Ken-Betwa link project which is
a diversion cum storage comprises of :

A 73.40 m high and 1468m long earth dam access river Ken near Dandhan village

A 326 m long side channel spill way on left flank.

An underground powerhouse with 3.20 MW installed capacity

A powerhouse at the end of the 2km tunnel with 2.6 MW installed capacity.

A 231.45 km long canal for transferring water from Ken river to River Betwa.

The construction of the proposed dam at Daudhan village in Chattarpur
district of M.P. will lead to submergence of 17419.75 ha land and
1056 families will be uprooted. There is no cost estimate for
resettlement of these villages. Displacement issues are addressed in
only 4 lines in the entire feasibility report. "As the entire
submergence area lies in Madhya Pradesh, a majority of the oustees
will be settled in Madhya Pradesh. However, it is proposed that some
of them may be settled in Uttar Pradesh since Uttar Pradesh is also
one of the beneficiaries of the project".

The Daudhan dam is situated in the Panna National Park, and will have
a severe impact on wildlife and biodiversity. Panna is the twenty
second Tiger Reserve of India and fifth in the State of Madhya
Pradesh. It is situated in the Vindhya Ranges and spread over Panna
and Chattarpur districts in the North of the State. The Ken River
which flows through the Reserve is a home for Gharial and Magar and
other aquatic fauna.

About 200 species of birds have been identified in the park. Besides
tigers, the park has Leopards, Sloth bear, Wolf, Wild dog, Wild boar,
Hyena, Sambhar, Cheetal, Neelgar, Chausnigha, Porcupine, Jungle Cat.
Many of these species are endangered species. While posing a severe
threat to endangered species, the M.P. Government's comment on the
feasibility report carelessly states:

The impact of the project on the wild life will be nil, as the wild
life has got the natural characteristic of shifting to forest areas
adjacent to the project area.

The project will also lead to severe erosion of agricultural
biodiversity. Existing crop diversity in the Ken and Betwa basins and
along the proposed canal include Kodikutke, jowar, urad, arhar,
oilseeds, wheat. In the Betwa basin 48.52% is under high value
rainfed wheat and 26.9% under pulses. The indigenous wheats of
Bundelkhand sell at twice the value of Green Revolution varieties.
And Bundlekhand is one of the remaining pockets of pulses production.
The project envisages a shift from these high value water prudent
crops to low value water intensive crops such as paddy, sugarcane and
soya bean.

Thus the project will erode biodiversity and lead to non-sustainable
water use. Water wasteful agriculture is the most important factor in
non-sustainable water use. Instead of promoting conservation of
biodiversity and water, the project promotes water waste and
destruction of biodiversity in one of the last remaining pockets of
crop-biodiversity.

At a time when conservation should guide water resource planning, an
obsolete paradigm of non-sustainable water use and water management
is being pushed through the river linking project. The real "Amrit
Kranti" needs support to biodiversity and water conservation, organic
farming, and rejuvenation of rivers and groundwater. The pseudo
science of river linking needs to give way to the science of living
sustainably with our water systems. Going further to tap more distant
rivers will not convert non-sustainable use to sustainable use. It
will merely expand the scope of non-sustainability.

The Ken-Betwa link will also increase conflicts over rivers. U.P. and
M.P. already have a number of water disputes. Of the 10 water
conflicts, 2 are over Betwa river waters, 2 are over Ken river
waters, 1 over Yamuna and one each over Banne and Urmil rivers.



People's voice: The Water Parliament on Ken-Betwa

Peace and prosperity through water can only be achieved through
sustainability and democracy. That is why on the basis of its study
the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology had
organized a "Water Parliament" on the Ken-Betwa link at Orchha on
July 23, 2003, the birth anniversary of Chandra Shekhar Azad, a
freedom fighter. The people of Bundelkhand passed the following
resolution at the Water Parliament -

"The residents of the district of Hamirpur are of the opinion that
the proposed link will further worsen the flood situation in the
flood prone districts of the Bundelkhand region as most of the rivers
are flooded in the rainy season.

According to farmers of Banda, the project will catalyse the drought
in the region as the already existing dams on Ken and Betwa rivers
get dried during the summer season.

In the opinion of farmers of the region the proposed cropping pattern
will result into diminishing of the traditional crops having high
nutritious value. According to them these are being grown in the
region for ages.

The natives of the villages which will be subjected to submergence
due to the linking of Ken and Betwa rivers are not ready to leave
their fertile land for any compensation offered to them by the
Government. According to them their land is highly fertile and the
value of this land cannot be estimated. It is invaluable for them.

Ecologically and economically, the cost of the project will outweigh
the benefits. We therefore call on the government not to rush ahead
with this destructive project and instead invite the people of
Bundlekhand to prepare and participate in a sustainable and equitable
water plan for the region."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager