LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  December 1999

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE December 1999

Subject:

Bioethics : A Third World Issue

From:

"S. E. Anderson" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 10 Dec 1999 22:11:48 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (242 lines)

Dr. Vandana Shiva has, once again, supplied us with some of her politics
of science wisdom as applicable to he Third World. This is great
material for our classes and ammunition in our struggle against 21st
Century Imperialism. She welcomes comments and criticisms from us? S. E.
Anderson



Bioethics: A Third World Issue
by Dr. Vandana Shiva

Dr. Vandana Shiva, well-known, much-honored physicist,
philosopher, ecofeminist director of the Research
Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology,
vice-president of the Third World Network, and author
of several celebrated works including _Staying Alive_,
_The Violence of the Green Revolution_, and
_Monocultures of the Mind_, has asked that this article
be put on the internet and circulated as widely as
possible. The Edmonds Institute is delighted to comply
with her request. Please post her article to whatever
persons or bulletin boards or listservers you think
appropriate.


In a recent article entitled, "The Bogus Debate on
Bioethics", Suman Sahai has stated that ethical
concerns are largely a luxury of developed countries
which the Third World cannot afford. She calls the
bioethics debate an essentially Western phenomenon.

I would like to differ with Suman Sahai on her
presumptions that bioethics is not Indian or Third
World in content or substance and that ethics is a
luxury for the Third World. In fact it is the
separation of ethics from technology that is a
peculiarly Western phenomenon, and by calling the
bioethics debate "bogus", Suman Sahai is speaking like
the transnational biotechnology industry which refers
to ethics as an "irrelevant concern". In fact Suman
Sahai was cheered loudest on the internet by Henry
Miller of Stanford University Hoover Institute, a
right-wing think tank, who has been acting as a major
spokesman of the U.S. biotech industry.

The argument that the Third World cannot afford
bioethics is systematically used by the biotech
industry which states that for the hungry, ethics and
safety is irrelevant. This was also the logic used by
Lawrence Summers when he recommended that polluting
industry should be shifted to the Third World. Removing
ethics from technological and economic decisions is a
western construct. THIS is the imported dichotomy. The
import of this dichotomy enables control and
colonization.

The separation of science and technology from ethics is
based on the Cartesian divide between res extensa
(matter) and res cognitans (mind), with the objective
mind acquiring objective and neutral knowledge of
nature. It was also constructed by Hume when he said no
logical inference could be drawn from what "is" to what
"ought to be". "Hume's guillotine" was an effective
instrument for separating ethics from science (which in
the empiricist and positivist philosophy was supposed
to provide an objective view of what "is").

However, knowledge and knowing are not neutral -- they
are products of the values of the knower and the
culture of which the knower is a part. Ethics and
science are related because values are intrinsic to
science. Ethics and technology are related because
values shape technology, they shape technology choice,
and they determine who gains and who loses through
impacts of technology on society.

There are a number of reasons why bioethics is even
more important for the Third World than for the West.

Firstly, ethics and values are distinct elements of our
cultural identity and our pluralistic civilization.

The ancient Ishoupanishad has stated:

"The universe is the creation of the Supreme Power
meant for the benefit of all creation. Each individual
life form must, therefore, learn to enjoy its benefits
by farming a part of the system in close relation with
other species. Let not any one species encroach upon
others rights."

On his 60th birthday His Holiness the Dalai Lama wrote
a message to me after my speech on new technologies and
new property rights:

"All sentient beings, including the small insects,
cherish themselves. All have the right to overcome
suffering and achieve happiness. I therefore pray that
we show love and compassion to all."

Tagore in his famous essay Tapovan had stated:

"Contemporary western civilization is built of brick
and wood. It is rooted in the city. But Indian
civilization has been distinctive in locating its
source of regeneration, material and intellectual, in
the forest, not the city. India's best ideas have come
where man was in communion with trees and rivers and
lakes away from the crowds. The peace of the forest has
helped the intellectual evolution of man. The culture
of the forest has fueled the culture of Indian society.
The culture that has arisen from the forest has been
influenced by the diverse processes of renewal of life
which are always at play in the forest, varying from
species to species, from season to season, in sight and
sound and smell. The unifying principle of life in
diversity, of democratic pluralism, thus became the
principle of Indian civilization."

Compassion and concern for other species is therefore
very indigenous to our pluralistic culture, and
bioethics builds on this indigenous tradition.

Secondly, bioethics is particularly significant for us
because it is the Third World's biodiversity and human
diversity that is being pirated by Northern
corporations. While the Northern corporations can
afford to say ethics is irrelevant to the appropriation
of the South's biodiversity, the indigenous people and
Third World farmers whose blood samples and seeds are
taken freely and then patented and commercialized
cannot afford to put ethics and justice aside. It is in
fact from Third World communities that the bioethics
imperative has first been raised on these issues.

Thirdly, value dimensions determine the context of
biotechnology development because of safety issues. In
fact, it is the Third World or South which has
introduced Article 19.3 and got a decision within the
Convention on Biological Diversity to develop a
biosafety protocol. It continues to be the Third World
which is leading the debate on the ethics of biosafety.

Bioethics and value decisions are necessary in the
Third World because biotechnology, like any technology,
is not neutral in its impacts. It carries
disproportionate benefits for some people, and
disproportionate costs for others. To ask who gains and
who loses, and what are the benefits and what are the
costs, is to ask ethical questions. It is the Third
World which has raised these issues in the Convention
on Biological Diversity. It is the powerful
industrialized nations which insist that bioethics is a
luxury for the Third World.

Unfortunately, Suman Sahai of the Gene Campaign has
joined this Northern chorus singing Bioethics is a
luxury for the Third World. In her paper she assumes
that what is good for transnational corporations (TNCs)
is good for people, that what is good for seed
corporations is good for farmers. She gives the 'Flavr
Savr' tomato as an example of biotechnology application
that is promising to the Third World and suggests that
ethical and value decisions about the 'Flavr Savr' will
block benefits from coming to Indian farmers and
consumers. The 'Flavr Savr' is a bad example because it
was a technology that served the interests of the trade
industry that made tomatoes for prolonged shelf life.

However, the needs of corporate interests do not
reflect the needs of people. The alternative to
prolonged shelf life and long-distance trade is not the
reengineering of fruits and vegetables. The alternative
is to reduce "food miles".

Cuba for example has used the crisis of the US trade
embargo to create thousands of urban organic gardens to
meet the vegetable needs of each city from within its
municipal limits.

Long distance transport for basic food stuffs which
could be grown locally serves the interests of global
agribusiness, not the small farmer.

Thus, while Pepsico paid only Rs.0.75 to Punjab farmers
for growing tomatoes, exporters like Pepsico receive
Rs.10/- as subsidies for transport. Without these
subsidies, non-local supply of food controlled by TNCs
and produced with capital intensive methods would not
be able to displace local food production produced
sustainably with low external inputs.

Global traders controlling production and distribution
worldwide need square tomatoes and tomatoes that don't
rot. Small farmers and consumers looking for fresh
produce do not.

People need locally produced food, consumed as close as
possible to the point of production.

In any case, the biotech miracles that are made to look
inevitable don't work reliably either. The 'Flavr Savr'
tomato was a failure and Calgene, the company that
launched it, had to be bailed out by Monsanto.
Exaggerating benefits and universalizing beneficiaries
have major ethical and economic implications. It is
important to look at the realistic achievements of
biotechnology and make ethical decisions on
the basis of what biotechnology has to offer for whom,
both in terms of costs as well as in terms of benefits.

To declare ethics and values as irrelevant to the Third
World in the context of biotechnology is to invite
intellectual colonization. At worst, it is an
invitation to disaster.

****************************** END

Dr. Vandana Shiva can be reached via:
Research Institute for Science, Technology and Ecology
A-60 Hauz Khas
New Delhi 110 016 INDIA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

The Suman Sahai article to which Dr. Shiva refers was
originally published in  the journal "Biotechnology and
Development Monitor".

*******************************************************

-------------------------------------------------------
Pure Food Campaign, 860 Highway 61, Little Marais,
Minnesota 55614

Activist or Media Inquiries:
(218) 226-4164 or (202) 775-1132

Requests for Consumer Information:
(800) 253-0681
Fax: (218) 226-4157
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager