Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.0 Help - SKIVT-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

SKIVT-L Archives

March 2006, Week 2

SKIVT-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SKIVT-L Home SKIVT-L Home
SKIVT-L March 2006, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Upslope Snow Event Accumulations
From:
Peter Salts <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Skiing Discussion and Snow Reports <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:15:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
It does - thanks Mike and Scott.

PS

-----Original Message-----
From: Vermont Skiing Discussion and Snow Reports
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Scott Braaten
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 6:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SKIVT-L] Upslope Snow Event Accumulations


On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:54:25 -0500, Mike Bernstein <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:48:15 -0500, Peter Salts <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:
>
>>Scott - maybe you have discussed this before, but, what exactly is an
>upslope event?  I have a general idea but I'm sure it can do with some
>more explanation.
>>
>
>Not to step on Scott's toes, but this is a layup.  Basically when you have
>moist air being advected into the area, it hits the 3000' to 4000' wall
>that is the Green Mtn spine.  You end up with orographic uplift, as the
>air must climb from the depths of the Champlain Valley over the top of the
>spine.  As the air increases in elevation, it cools and loses it's ability
>to hold this moisture.  As such, assuming a proper temp profile, you end
>up getting clouds and snowfall along the spine (obviously this doesn't
>just happen here.  This phenomenon is partly responsible for the
>tremendous snowfall totals in the Wasatch and the Tetons) while it might
>be sunny in Burlington and Montpelier.
>

Mike has it covered pretty well.  Just whenever I mention an upslope snow 
event (hard to even term it "storm") I mean that there is no major 
synoptic (low pressure system for example) storm but more a localized 
event caused by the forced lifting from terrain.  95% of the time it will 
not include significant accumulations in the lower elevations and is very 
localized even in the higher terrain (right along the spine). 

Same deal with a lake effect event...it is a "snowstorm" for the few 
people under the lake band, but on a whole, it doesn't affect many 
populated regions.

Hope that and Mikes description helps,
Scott

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html
 
This email with all information contained herein or attached hereto may contain confidential and/or privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and immediately delete this email in its entirety and any attachments thereto.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV