On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:54:50 -0500, Wesley Alan Wright
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>Not epic. More like "bony" "thin" "hazards" vs "good" "ok" "skiable"
>
>>  If that's the case, is the 40" line really the
>> minimum recommended depth, or is that the "epic"
>
>Minimum recommended. Field Tested. And, on average, not reached until
>mid-January.
>
>> Or maybe the "need-to-get-skied-bad" has just gone to my
>> head.
>
>That, and living inn the biggest city in the world rather than the
>smallest state in the nation. It isn't even New Years yet: relax, be
>patient, don't fall for marketing hype. And don't risk serious injury
>on risky terrain skiing prematurely, especially if you have already
>placed a non-refundable deposit on a western ski trip.
>

Ah, I should have suspected this much more sound methodology.  It's still
early, I guess.  As usual, the young padowan must bow in homage to the
master.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html