| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 1999 11:48:16 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim & Shirley wrote:
> This should start a good thread, define "good".
>
It's a floating thing. I'm curious what the experts say, but to me, any day
when there's enough snow to open the woods, and/or leave unpacked on the
trails is always, automatically, by definition, good. (Breakable crust
counts. Challenging does not mean not good. Boilerplate... umm, that's a
tough one). Right now I'd just like a trail. Good is if it has more than 500
vertical, it has some element of steepness somewhere, and less people/sq.yd.
than Grand Central at 5:00.
> Does this come from some neat trivia program
No.
> or do people actually
> sit around contemplating these things?
Sadly, yes.
> We need snow worse than we think.
Like the thread sez: *Definitely*
Keep those weather updates and snow sightings coming folks.
--telenaut
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html
|
|
|