Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.0 Help - SKIVT-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

SKIVT-L Archives

March 2006, Week 2

SKIVT-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SKIVT-L Home SKIVT-L Home
SKIVT-L March 2006, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Only 20 Days Left
From:
Wesley Alan Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Skiing Discussion and Snow Reports <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:02:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Marc Chrusch wrote:

>
>
> *My understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) is that replacing the  
> MRG single with a double would have been cheaper than refurbishing  
> the single. Put on half as many chairs and the uphill capacity  
> isn't altered. But hey, it's their co-op and their vote - I really  
> don't care.

Marginally cheaper. The three options (all with the same 500 people  
per hour uphill capacity as the present lift) considered in detail were:

1.      A new Single Chair ($1.3 million) – A completely new Single  
with ramp unload, modern tube towers, and a modern drive and return  
station.

2.      Rebuild of the current Single Chair ($1.4 million) – Reuse of  
the present lattice towers and line.  New Chairs with the same design  
as the original chairs; consistent aesthetics; and state of the art  
components improved for safety, reliability, and maintainability.   
Drive components would housed in the present drive building.  The  
current return station would be reused, with improvements in the  
bullwheel and carriage design.  This option would utilize an electric  
regenerative drive with full diesel backup.

3.      A new Double Chair ($1.1 million).  Entirely new, “industry  
standard” double chair.  A double with 800 people per hour (“pph”)  
capacity would cost $1.3 million and a double with 1,000 pph capacity  
would cost $1.6 million.

Co-op voted for option 2.

I voted for a 120 person tram up the backside from Jerusalem so I  
wouldn't have to drive over the gap during snowstorms.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Wesley Alan Wright <mailto:[log in to unmask]>                   |
| Academic Computing Services       __0__                             |
| Room 238 Waterman Building       / \ | \                            |
| University of Vermont              \77                              |
| Burlington, Vermont 05405-0160 USA. \\  http://www.uvm.edu/skivt-l  |
| Voice:802-656-1254 FAX:802-656-0872  vv                             |
| aim:goim?screenname=maddogskideath      http://www.uvm.edu/~waw/    |

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV