| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 3 Jun 2016 18:43:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_5EF28266-87C0-409B-A540-3B7CE8A395C1" |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks Matt,
I missed the quote - "I always lock my bindings to not lose my skis on a run. It’s a personal choice." in the link on the first posting to that thread.
Interesting that some later posters say that DIN 12 is about the breaking point of a human leg.
Randy
> Basically, she destroyed the top of her tibia & all of the soft tissue in
> her left knee (cartilage, menisci (?) ligaments). Based on her account, it
> sounds like she had her tech binding toes intentionally set in the uphill
> (non-release) setting, which could have been a contributing factor to her
> injuries. Some people will do that in no-fall scenarios, but as one of the
> subsequent posters pointed out, if you're skiing at relatively high speeds,
> should you really be using the non-release setting? It sounds like operator
> error to me, not a binding issue.
>
> —Matt
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Randy Witlicki <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Can anybody make sense of this skier injury in the thread below.
>> The link in the first post has the initial story.
>> Is this a binding setting issue?
>>
>> http://snowheads.com/ski-forum/viewtopic.php?t=125854#2897226
>>
>> Randy
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html
|
|
|