Isn't there something in VT land use rules (Act 250, I think?) about
the 2500' elevation line?

And isn't KBL at 2540'? (That's what the old topo trail maps say,
anyways.)

Supposing the above were true, it would make developing residential
units in the main lot difficult.


On Fri, 28 May 2004 14:24:31 -0700, Mig wrote:

> --- Geoff Devine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > The Snowshed parking lot.  This is meant to be the site of the new
> > village.
>
> Really?  This is a big change, isn't it? I had always assumed the
> village would be built at the K Base.  I suppose it's great because
> the impact on parking for day skiers would be small.  But Snowshed
> seems like a pretty poor choice because everyone above novice would
> have to ride extra lifts to get to the skiing.  Is the K Base parking
> lot off limits for some reason?
>
> Thanks for the update, I'm interested in this stuff.
>
> Mig
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://messenger.yahoo.com/
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
>
> To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html